IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v583y2020i7815d10.1038_s41586-020-2347-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insights into variation in meiosis from 31,228 human sperm genomes

Author

Listed:
  • Avery Davis Bell

    (Harvard Medical School
    Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Curtis J. Mello

    (Harvard Medical School
    Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • James Nemesh

    (Harvard Medical School
    Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Sara A. Brumbaugh

    (Harvard Medical School
    Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Alec Wysoker

    (Harvard Medical School
    Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Steven A. McCarroll

    (Harvard Medical School
    Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

Abstract

Meiosis, although essential for reproduction, is also variable and error-prone: rates of chromosome crossover vary among gametes, between the sexes, and among humans of the same sex, and chromosome missegregation leads to abnormal chromosome numbers (aneuploidy)1–8. To study diverse meiotic outcomes and how they covary across chromosomes, gametes and humans, we developed Sperm-seq, a way of simultaneously analysing the genomes of thousands of individual sperm. Here we analyse the genomes of 31,228 human gametes from 20 sperm donors, identifying 813,122 crossovers and 787 aneuploid chromosomes. Sperm donors had aneuploidy rates ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 aneuploidies per gamete; crossovers partially protected chromosomes from nondisjunction at the meiosis I cell division. Some chromosomes and donors underwent more-frequent nondisjunction during meiosis I, and others showed more meiosis II segregation failures. Sperm genomes also manifested many genomic anomalies that could not be explained by simple nondisjunction. Diverse recombination phenotypes—from crossover rates to crossover location and separation, a measure of crossover interference—covaried strongly across individuals and cells. Our results can be incorporated with earlier observations into a unified model in which a core mechanism, the variable physical compaction of meiotic chromosomes, generates interindividual and cell-to-cell variation in diverse meiotic phenotypes.

Suggested Citation

  • Avery Davis Bell & Curtis J. Mello & James Nemesh & Sara A. Brumbaugh & Alec Wysoker & Steven A. McCarroll, 2020. "Insights into variation in meiosis from 31,228 human sperm genomes," Nature, Nature, vol. 583(7815), pages 259-264, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:583:y:2020:i:7815:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2347-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2347-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2347-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2347-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cerys E. Currie & Emma Ford & Lucy Benham Whyte & Deborah M. Taylor & Bettina P. Mihalas & Muriel Erent & Adele L. Marston & Geraldine M. Hartshorne & Andrew D. McAinsh, 2022. "The first mitotic division of human embryos is highly error prone," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Wu Zuo & Guangming Chen & Zhimei Gao & Shuai Li & Yanyan Chen & Chenhui Huang & Juan Chen & Zhengjun Chen & Ming Lei & Qian Bian, 2021. "Stage-resolved Hi-C analyses reveal meiotic chromosome organizational features influencing homolog alignment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Marcel Ernst & Raphael Mercier & David Zwicker, 2024. "Interference length reveals regularity of crossover placement across species," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:583:y:2020:i:7815:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2347-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.