IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v581y2020i7809d10.1038_d41586-020-01452-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The epic battle against coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Ball
  • Amy Maxmen

Abstract

Analysts are tracking false rumours about COVID-19 in hopes of curbing their spread.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Ball & Amy Maxmen, 2020. "The epic battle against coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories," Nature, Nature, vol. 581(7809), pages 371-374, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:581:y:2020:i:7809:d:10.1038_d41586-020-01452-z
    DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-01452-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01452-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/d41586-020-01452-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gupta, Ashish & Li, Han & Farnoush, Alireza & Jiang, Wenting, 2022. "Understanding patterns of COVID infodemic: A systematic and pragmatic approach to curb fake news," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 670-683.
    2. Ramy Shaaban & Ramy Mohamed Ghazy & Fawzia Elsherif & Nancy Ali & Youssef Yakoub & Maged Osama Aly & Rony ElMakhzangy & Marwa Shawky Abdou & Bonny McKinna & Amira Mohamed Elzorkany & Fatimah Abdullah , 2022. "COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance among Social Media Users: A Content Analysis, Multi-Continent Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Malik Sallam & Deema Dababseh & Huda Eid & Hanan Hasan & Duaa Taim & Kholoud Al-Mahzoum & Ayat Al-Haidar & Alaa Yaseen & Nidaa A. Ababneh & Areej Assaf & Faris G. Bakri & Suzan Matar & Azmi Mahafzah, 2021. "Low COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Is Correlated with Conspiracy Beliefs among University Students in Jordan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Katharine J. Mach & Raúl Salas Reyes & Brian Pentz & Jennifer Taylor & Clarissa A. Costa & Sandip G. Cruz & Kerronia E. Thomas & James C. Arnott & Rosalind Donald & Kripa Jagannathan & Christine J. Ki, 2021. "News media coverage of COVID-19 public health and policy information," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Federica Maria Magarini & Margherita Pinelli & Arianna Sinisi & Silvia Ferrari & Giovanna Laura De Fazio & Gian Maria Galeazzi, 2021. "Irrational Beliefs about COVID-19: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Zhuang, Maiting & Garz , Marcel, 2022. "Media coverage and pandemic behaviour: Evidence from Sweden," SITE Working Paper Series 61, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics.
    7. Kalgotra, Pankush & Gupta, Ashish & Sharda, Ramesh, 2021. "Pandemic information support lifecycle: Evidence from the evolution of mobile apps during COVID-19," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 540-559.
    8. Stephanie Rodriguez-Besteiro & Ana Isabel Beltran-Velasco & José Francisco Tornero-Aguilera & Marina Begoña Martínez-González & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda & Vicente Javier Cleme, 2023. "Social Media, Anxiety and COVID-19 Lockdown Measurement Compliance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Ryan C. Moore & Ross Dahlke & Jeffrey T. Hancock, 2023. "Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2020 US election," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(7), pages 1096-1105, July.
    10. Nadejda Komendantova & Dmitry Erokhin & Teresa Albano, 2023. "Misinformation and Its Impact on Contested Policy Issues: The Example of Migration Discourses," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Lukas Zenk & Gerald Steiner & Miguel Pina e Cunha & Manfred D. Laubichler & Martin Bertau & Martin J. Kainz & Carlo Jäger & Eva S. Schernhammer, 2020. "Fast Response to Superspreading: Uncertainty and Complexity in the Context of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Isolde Martina Busch & Silvia Savazzi & Giuseppe Bertini & Paola Cesari & Olivia Guaraldo & Michela Nosè & Corrado Barbui & Michela Rimondini, 2022. "A Practical Framework for Academics to Implement Public Engagement Interventions and Measure Their Impact," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:581:y:2020:i:7809:d:10.1038_d41586-020-01452-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.