IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v578y2020i7794d10.1038_s41586-020-1964-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Processive extrusion of polypeptide loops by a Hsp100 disaggregase

Author

Listed:
  • Mario J. Avellaneda

    (AMOLF)

  • Kamila B. Franke

    (Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University, German Cancer Research Center)

  • Vanda Sunderlikova

    (AMOLF)

  • Bernd Bukau

    (Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University, German Cancer Research Center)

  • Axel Mogk

    (Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University, German Cancer Research Center)

  • Sander J. Tans

    (AMOLF
    Delft University of Technology)

Abstract

The ability to reverse protein aggregation is vital to cells1,2. Hsp100 disaggregases such as ClpB and Hsp104 are proposed to catalyse this reaction by translocating polypeptide loops through their central pore3,4. This model of disaggregation is appealing, as it could explain how polypeptides entangled within aggregates can be extracted and subsequently refolded with the assistance of Hsp704,5. However, the model is also controversial, as the necessary motor activity has not been identified6–8 and recent findings indicate non-processive mechanisms such as entropic pulling or Brownian ratcheting9,10. How loop formation would be accomplished is also obscure. Indeed, cryo-electron microscopy studies consistently show single polypeptide strands in the Hsp100 pore11,12. Here, by following individual ClpB–substrate complexes in real time, we unambiguously demonstrate processive translocation of looped polypeptides. We integrate optical tweezers with fluorescent-particle tracking to show that ClpB translocates both arms of the loop simultaneously and switches to single-arm translocation when encountering obstacles. ClpB is notably powerful and rapid; it exerts forces of more than 50 pN at speeds of more than 500 residues per second in bursts of up to 28 residues. Remarkably, substrates refold while exiting the pore, analogous to co-translational folding. Our findings have implications for protein-processing phenomena including ubiquitin-mediated remodelling by Cdc48 (or its mammalian orthologue p97)13 and degradation by the 26S proteasome14.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario J. Avellaneda & Kamila B. Franke & Vanda Sunderlikova & Bernd Bukau & Axel Mogk & Sander J. Tans, 2020. "Processive extrusion of polypeptide loops by a Hsp100 disaggregase," Nature, Nature, vol. 578(7794), pages 317-320, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:578:y:2020:i:7794:d:10.1038_s41586-020-1964-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-1964-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-1964-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-1964-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudio Mirabello & Björn Wallner & Björn Nystedt & Stavros Azinas & Marta Carroni, 2024. "Unmasking AlphaFold to integrate experiments and predictions in multimeric complexes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Yin-Wei Kuo & Mohammed Mahamdeh & Yazgan Tuna & Jonathon Howard, 2022. "The force required to remove tubulin from the microtubule lattice by pulling on its α-tubulin C-terminal tail," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:578:y:2020:i:7794:d:10.1038_s41586-020-1964-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.