IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v570y2019i7762d10.1038_s41586-019-1290-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pluripotency and the origin of animal multicellularity

Author

Listed:
  • Shunsuke Sogabe

    (University of Queensland
    School of Biology, University of St Andrews)

  • William L. Hatleberg

    (University of Queensland
    Carnegie Mellon University)

  • Kevin M. Kocot

    (University of Queensland
    The University of Alabama)

  • Tahsha E. Say

    (University of Queensland)

  • Daniel Stoupin

    (University of Queensland
    Port Douglas)

  • Kathrein E. Roper

    (University of Queensland
    University of Queensland)

  • Selene L. Fernandez-Valverde

    (University of Queensland
    Laboratorio Nacional de Genómica para la Biodiversidad, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN)

  • Sandie M. Degnan

    (University of Queensland)

  • Bernard M. Degnan

    (University of Queensland)

Abstract

A widely held—but rarely tested—hypothesis for the origin of animals is that they evolved from a unicellular ancestor, with an apical cilium surrounded by a microvillar collar, that structurally resembled modern sponge choanocytes and choanoflagellates1–4. Here we test this view of animal origins by comparing the transcriptomes, fates and behaviours of the three primary sponge cell types—choanocytes, pluripotent mesenchymal archaeocytes and epithelial pinacocytes—with choanoflagellates and other unicellular holozoans. Unexpectedly, we find that the transcriptome of sponge choanocytes is the least similar to the transcriptomes of choanoflagellates and is significantly enriched in genes unique to either animals or sponges alone. By contrast, pluripotent archaeocytes upregulate genes that control cell proliferation and gene expression, as in other metazoan stem cells and in the proliferating stages of two unicellular holozoans, including a colonial choanoflagellate. Choanocytes in the sponge Amphimedon queenslandica exist in a transient metastable state and readily transdifferentiate into archaeocytes, which can differentiate into a range of other cell types. These sponge cell-type conversions are similar to the temporal cell-state changes that occur in unicellular holozoans5. Together, these analyses argue against homology of sponge choanocytes and choanoflagellates, and the view that the first multicellular animals were simple balls of cells with limited capacity to differentiate. Instead, our results are consistent with the first animal cell being able to transition between multiple states in a manner similar to modern transdifferentiating and stem cells.

Suggested Citation

  • Shunsuke Sogabe & William L. Hatleberg & Kevin M. Kocot & Tahsha E. Say & Daniel Stoupin & Kathrein E. Roper & Selene L. Fernandez-Valverde & Sandie M. Degnan & Bernard M. Degnan, 2019. "Pluripotency and the origin of animal multicellularity," Nature, Nature, vol. 570(7762), pages 519-522, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:570:y:2019:i:7762:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1290-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1290-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1290-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-019-1290-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paula Miramón-Puértolas & Eudald Pascual-Carreras & Patrick R. H. Steinmetz, 2024. "A population of Vasa2 and Piwi1 expressing cells generates germ cells and neurons in a sea anemone," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:570:y:2019:i:7762:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1290-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.