IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v567y2019i7748d10.1038_s41586-019-0998-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cryo-EM structures of STING reveal its mechanism of activation by cyclic GMP–AMP

Author

Listed:
  • Guijun Shang

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Conggang Zhang

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Zhijian J. Chen

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Xiao-chen Bai

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Xuewu Zhang

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

Abstract

Infections by pathogens that contain DNA trigger the production of type-I interferons and inflammatory cytokines through cyclic GMP–AMP synthase, which produces 2′3′-cyclic GMP–AMP (cGAMP) that binds to and activates stimulator of interferon genes (STING; also known as TMEM173, MITA, ERIS and MPYS)1–8. STING is an endoplasmic-reticulum membrane protein that contains four transmembrane helices followed by a cytoplasmic ligand-binding and signalling domain9–13. The cytoplasmic domain of STING forms a dimer, which undergoes a conformational change upon binding to cGAMP9,14. However, it remains unclear how this conformational change leads to STING activation. Here we present cryo-electron microscopy structures of full-length STING from human and chicken in the inactive dimeric state (about 80 kDa in size), as well as cGAMP-bound chicken STING in both the dimeric and tetrameric states. The structures show that the transmembrane and cytoplasmic regions interact to form an integrated, domain-swapped dimeric assembly. Closure of the ligand-binding domain, induced by cGAMP, leads to a 180° rotation of the ligand-binding domain relative to the transmembrane domain. This rotation is coupled to a conformational change in a loop on the side of the ligand-binding-domain dimer, which leads to the formation of the STING tetramer and higher-order oligomers through side-by-side packing. This model of STING oligomerization and activation is supported by our structure-based mutational analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Guijun Shang & Conggang Zhang & Zhijian J. Chen & Xiao-chen Bai & Xuewu Zhang, 2019. "Cryo-EM structures of STING reveal its mechanism of activation by cyclic GMP–AMP," Nature, Nature, vol. 567(7748), pages 389-393, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:567:y:2019:i:7748:d:10.1038_s41586-019-0998-5
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-0998-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-0998-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-019-0998-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haruka Kemmoku & Kanoko Takahashi & Kojiro Mukai & Toshiki Mori & Koichiro M. Hirosawa & Fumika Kiku & Yasunori Uchida & Yoshihiko Kuchitsu & Yu Nishioka & Masaaki Sawa & Takuma Kishimoto & Kazuma Tan, 2024. "Single-molecule localization microscopy reveals STING clustering at the trans-Golgi network through palmitoylation-dependent accumulation of cholesterol," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Alex J. Pollock & Shivam A. Zaver & Joshua J. Woodward, 2020. "A STING-based biosensor affords broad cyclic dinucleotide detection within single living eukaryotic cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Yongfang Lin & Jing Yang & Qili Yang & Sha Zeng & Jiayu Zhang & Yuanxiang Zhu & Yuxin Tong & Lin Li & Weiqi Tan & Dahua Chen & Qinmiao Sun, 2023. "PTK2B promotes TBK1 and STING oligomerization and enhances the STING-TBK1 signaling," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Shirin Fatma & Arpita Chakravarti & Xuankun Zeng & Raven H. Huang, 2021. "Molecular mechanisms of the CdnG-Cap5 antiphage defense system employing 3′,2′-cGAMP as the second messenger," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Martha Triantafilou & Joshi Ramanjulu & Lee M. Booty & Gisela Jimenez-Duran & Hakan Keles & Ken Saunders & Neysa Nevins & Emma Koppe & Louise K. Modis & G. Scott Pesiridis & John Bertin & Kathy Triant, 2022. "Human rhinovirus promotes STING trafficking to replication organelles to promote viral replication," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Wei-Wei Luo & Zhen Tong & Pan Cao & Fu-Bing Wang & Ying Liu & Zhou-Qin Zheng & Su-Yun Wang & Shu Li & Yan-Yi Wang, 2022. "Transcription-independent regulation of STING activation and innate immune responses by IRF8 in monocytes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Matteo Gentili & Bingxu Liu & Malvina Papanastasiou & Deborah Dele-Oni & Marc A. Schwartz & Rebecca J. Carlson & Aziz M. Al’Khafaji & Karsten Krug & Adam Brown & John G. Doench & Steven A. Carr & Nir , 2023. "ESCRT-dependent STING degradation inhibits steady-state and cGAMP-induced signalling," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Bao-cun Zhang & Marlene F. Laursen & Lili Hu & Hossein Hazrati & Ryo Narita & Lea S. Jensen & Aida S. Hansen & Jinrong Huang & Yan Zhang & Xiangning Ding & Maimaitili Muyesier & Emil Nilsson & Agniesz, 2024. "Cholesterol-binding motifs in STING that control endoplasmic reticulum retention mediate anti-tumoral activity of cholesterol-lowering compounds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:567:y:2019:i:7748:d:10.1038_s41586-019-0998-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.