IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v520y2015i7548d10.1038_nature14302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA

Author

Listed:
  • Asaf Levy

    (Weizmann Institute of Science)

  • Moran G. Goren

    (Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University)

  • Ido Yosef

    (Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University)

  • Oren Auster

    (Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University)

  • Miriam Manor

    (Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University)

  • Gil Amitai

    (Weizmann Institute of Science)

  • Rotem Edgar

    (Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University)

  • Udi Qimron

    (Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University)

  • Rotem Sorek

    (Weizmann Institute of Science)

Abstract

CRISPR–Cas (clustered, regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats coupled with CRISPR-associated proteins) is a bacterial immunity system that protects against invading phages or plasmids. In the process of CRISPR adaptation, short pieces of DNA (‘spacers’) are acquired from foreign elements and integrated into the CRISPR array. So far, it has remained a mystery how spacers are preferentially acquired from the foreign DNA while the self chromosome is avoided. Here we show that spacer acquisition is replication-dependent, and that DNA breaks formed at stalled replication forks promote spacer acquisition. Chromosomal hotspots of spacer acquisition were confined by Chi sites, which are sequence octamers highly enriched on the bacterial chromosome, suggesting that these sites limit spacer acquisition from self DNA. We further show that the avoidance of self is mediated by the RecBCD double-stranded DNA break repair complex. Our results suggest that, in Escherichia coli, acquisition of new spacers largely depends on RecBCD-mediated processing of double-stranded DNA breaks occurring primarily at replication forks, and that the preference for foreign DNA is achieved through the higher density of Chi sites on the self chromosome, in combination with the higher number of forks on the foreign DNA. This model explains the strong preference to acquire spacers both from high copy plasmids and from phages.

Suggested Citation

  • Asaf Levy & Moran G. Goren & Ido Yosef & Oren Auster & Miriam Manor & Gil Amitai & Rotem Edgar & Udi Qimron & Rotem Sorek, 2015. "CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA," Nature, Nature, vol. 520(7548), pages 505-510, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:520:y:2015:i:7548:d:10.1038_nature14302
    DOI: 10.1038/nature14302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14302
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature14302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lidiya Lisitskaya & Yeonoh Shin & Aleksei Agapov & Anna Olina & Ekaterina Kropocheva & Sergei Ryazansky & Alexei A. Aravin & Daria Esyunina & Katsuhiko S. Murakami & Andrey Kulbachinskiy, 2022. "Programmable RNA targeting by bacterial Argonaute nucleases with unconventional guide binding and cleavage specificity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Jack P. K. Bravo & Cristian Aparicio-Maldonado & Franklin L. Nobrega & Stan J. J. Brouns & David W. Taylor, 2022. "Structural basis for broad anti-phage immunity by DISARM," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Serena Bradde & Marija Vucelja & Tiberiu Teşileanu & Vijay Balasubramanian, 2017. "Dynamics of adaptive immunity against phage in bacterial populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:520:y:2015:i:7548:d:10.1038_nature14302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.