Author
Listed:
- María Abad
(Tumour Suppression Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid E-28029, Spain)
- Lluc Mosteiro
(Tumour Suppression Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid E-28029, Spain)
- Cristina Pantoja
(Tumour Suppression Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid E-28029, Spain)
- Marta Cañamero
(Histopathology Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid E-28029, Spain)
- Teresa Rayon
(Spanish National Cardiovascular Research Centre (CNIC), Madrid E-28029, Spain)
- Inmaculada Ors
(Spanish National Cardiovascular Research Centre (CNIC), Madrid E-28029, Spain)
- Osvaldo Graña
(Bioinformatics Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid E-28029, Spain)
- Diego Megías
(Confocal Microscopy Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid E-28029, Spain)
- Orlando Domínguez
(Genomics Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid E-28029, Spain)
- Dolores Martínez
(Flow Cytometry Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid E-28029, Spain)
- Miguel Manzanares
(Spanish National Cardiovascular Research Centre (CNIC), Madrid E-28029, Spain)
- Sagrario Ortega
(Transgenic Mice Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid E-28029, Spain)
- Manuel Serrano
(Tumour Suppression Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid E-28029, Spain)
Abstract
Reprogramming of adult cells to generate induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) has opened new therapeutic opportunities; however, little is known about the possibility of in vivo reprogramming within tissues. Here we show that transitory induction of the four factors Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc in mice results in teratomas emerging from multiple organs, implying that full reprogramming can occur in vivo. Analyses of the stomach, intestine, pancreas and kidney reveal groups of dedifferentiated cells that express the pluripotency marker NANOG, indicative of in situ reprogramming. By bone marrow transplantation, we demonstrate that haematopoietic cells can also be reprogrammed in vivo. Notably, reprogrammable mice present circulating iPS cells in the blood and, at the transcriptome level, these in vivo generated iPS cells are closer to embryonic stem cells (ES cells) than standard in vitro generated iPS cells. Moreover, in vivo iPS cells efficiently contribute to the trophectoderm lineage, suggesting that they achieve a more plastic or primitive state than ES cells. Finally, intraperitoneal injection of in vivo iPS cells generates embryo-like structures that express embryonic and extraembryonic markers. We conclude that reprogramming in vivo is feasible and confers totipotency features absent in standard iPS or ES cells. These discoveries could be relevant for future applications of reprogramming in regenerative medicine.
Suggested Citation
María Abad & Lluc Mosteiro & Cristina Pantoja & Marta Cañamero & Teresa Rayon & Inmaculada Ors & Osvaldo Graña & Diego Megías & Orlando Domínguez & Dolores Martínez & Miguel Manzanares & Sagrario Orte, 2013.
"Reprogramming in vivo produces teratomas and iPS cells with totipotency features,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 502(7471), pages 340-345, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:502:y:2013:i:7471:d:10.1038_nature12586
DOI: 10.1038/nature12586
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Maria Arez & Melanie Eckersley-Maslin & Tajda Klobučar & João Gilsa Lopes & Felix Krueger & Annalisa Mupo & Ana Cláudia Raposo & David Oxley & Samantha Mancino & Anne-Valerie Gendrel & Bruno Bernardes, 2022.
"Imprinting fidelity in mouse iPSCs depends on sex of donor cell and medium formulation,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
- Ali Doğa Yücel & Vadim N. Gladyshev, 2024.
"The long and winding road of reprogramming-induced rejuvenation,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:502:y:2013:i:7471:d:10.1038_nature12586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.