IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v450y2007i7169d10.1038_nature06281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innate versus learned odour processing in the mouse olfactory bulb

Author

Listed:
  • Ko Kobayakawa

    (Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo)

  • Reiko Kobayakawa

    (Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo)

  • Hideyuki Matsumoto

    (Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo)

  • Yuichiro Oka

    (Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo)

  • Takeshi Imai

    (Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo)

  • Masahito Ikawa

    (Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, The Osaka University)

  • Masaru Okabe

    (Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, The Osaka University)

  • Toshio Ikeda

    (Laboratory for Behavioral Genetics, Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, Saitama 351-0198, Japan)

  • Shigeyoshi Itohara

    (Laboratory for Behavioral Genetics, Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, Saitama 351-0198, Japan)

  • Takefumi Kikusui

    (Laboratory of Veterinary Ethology, The University of Tokyo)

  • Kensaku Mori

    (Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo)

  • Hitoshi Sakano

    (Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo)

Abstract

The mammalian olfactory system mediates various responses, including aversive behaviours to spoiled foods and fear responses to predator odours. In the olfactory bulb, each glomerulus represents a single species of odorant receptor. Because a single odorant can interact with several different receptor species, the odour information received in the olfactory epithelium is converted to a topographical map of multiple glomeruli activated in distinct areas in the olfactory bulb. To study how the odour map is interpreted in the brain, we generated mutant mice in which olfactory sensory neurons in a specific area of the olfactory epithelium are ablated by targeted expression of the diphtheria toxin gene. Here we show that, in dorsal-zone-depleted mice, the dorsal domain of the olfactory bulb was devoid of glomerular structures, although second-order neurons were present in the vacant areas. The mutant mice lacked innate responses to aversive odorants, even though they were capable of detecting them and could be conditioned for aversion with the remaining glomeruli. These results indicate that, in mice, aversive information is received in the olfactory bulb by separate sets of glomeruli, those dedicated for innate and those for learned responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Ko Kobayakawa & Reiko Kobayakawa & Hideyuki Matsumoto & Yuichiro Oka & Takeshi Imai & Masahito Ikawa & Masaru Okabe & Toshio Ikeda & Shigeyoshi Itohara & Takefumi Kikusui & Kensaku Mori & Hitoshi Saka, 2007. "Innate versus learned odour processing in the mouse olfactory bulb," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7169), pages 503-508, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:450:y:2007:i:7169:d:10.1038_nature06281
    DOI: 10.1038/nature06281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06281
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature06281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin W. Zhu & Shawn D. Burton & Maira H. Nagai & Justin D. Silverman & Claire A. March & Matt Wachowiak & Hiroaki Matsunami, 2022. "Decoding the olfactory map through targeted transcriptomics links murine olfactory receptors to glomeruli," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Chikako Nakajima & Masato Sawada & Erika Umeda & Yuma Takagi & Norihiko Nakashima & Kazuya Kuboyama & Naoko Kaneko & Satoaki Yamamoto & Haruno Nakamura & Naoki Shimada & Koichiro Nakamura & Kumiko Mat, 2024. "Identification of the growth cone as a probe and driver of neuronal migration in the injured brain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:450:y:2007:i:7169:d:10.1038_nature06281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.