IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v432y2004i7020d10.1038_nature03174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew S. Ackerman

    (NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field)

  • Michael P. Kirkpatrick

    (University of Tasmania)

  • David E. Stevens

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Owen B. Toon

    (University of Colorado)

Abstract

Some of the global warming from anthropogenic greenhouse gases is offset by increased reflection of solar radiation by clouds with smaller droplets that form in air polluted with aerosol particles that serve as cloud condensation nuclei1. The resulting cooling tendency, termed the indirect aerosol forcing, is thought to be comparable in magnitude to the forcing by anthropogenic CO2, but it is difficult to estimate because the physical processes that determine global aerosol and cloud populations are poorly understood2. Smaller cloud droplets not only reflect sunlight more effectively, but also inhibit precipitation, which is expected to result in increased cloud water3,4. Such an increase in cloud water would result in even more reflective clouds, further increasing the indirect forcing. Marine boundary-layer clouds polluted by aerosol particles, however, are not generally observed to hold more water5,6,7. Here we simulate stratocumulus clouds with a fluid dynamics model that includes detailed treatments of cloud microphysics and radiative transfer. Our simulations show that the response of cloud water to suppression of precipitation from increased droplet concentrations is determined by a competition between moistening from decreased surface precipitation and drying from increased entrainment of overlying air. Only when the overlying air is humid or droplet concentrations are very low does sufficient precipitation reach the surface to allow cloud water to increase with droplet concentrations. Otherwise, the response of cloud water to aerosol-induced suppression of precipitation is dominated by enhanced entrainment of overlying dry air. In this scenario, cloud water is reduced as droplet concentrations increase, which diminishes the indirect climate forcing.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew S. Ackerman & Michael P. Kirkpatrick & David E. Stevens & Owen B. Toon, 2004. "The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing," Nature, Nature, vol. 432(7020), pages 1014-1017, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:432:y:2004:i:7020:d:10.1038_nature03174
    DOI: 10.1038/nature03174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature03174
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature03174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Wood & Thomas Ackerman, 2013. "Defining success and limits of field experiments to test geoengineering by marine cloud brightening," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 459-472, December.
    2. Antti Arola & Antti Lipponen & Pekka Kolmonen & Timo H. Virtanen & Nicolas Bellouin & Daniel P. Grosvenor & Edward Gryspeerdt & Johannes Quaas & Harri Kokkola, 2022. "Aerosol effects on clouds are concealed by natural cloud heterogeneity and satellite retrieval errors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Alan Robock & Douglas MacMartin & Riley Duren & Matthew Christensen, 2013. "Studying geoengineering with natural and anthropogenic analogs," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 445-458, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:432:y:2004:i:7020:d:10.1038_nature03174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.