IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v431y2004i7011d10.1038_nature03022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Megabase deletions of gene deserts result in viable mice

Author

Listed:
  • Marcelo A. Nóbrega

    (DOE Joint Genome Institute Walnut Creek
    Genomics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley)

  • Yiwen Zhu

    (DOE Joint Genome Institute Walnut Creek
    Genomics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley)

  • Ingrid Plajzer-Frick

    (DOE Joint Genome Institute Walnut Creek
    Genomics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley)

  • Veena Afzal

    (DOE Joint Genome Institute Walnut Creek
    Genomics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley)

  • Edward M. Rubin

    (DOE Joint Genome Institute Walnut Creek
    Genomics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley)

Abstract

The functional importance of the roughly 98% of mammalian genomes not corresponding to protein coding sequences remains largely undetermined1. Here we show that some large-scale deletions of the non-coding DNA referred to as gene deserts2,3,4 can be well tolerated by an organism. We deleted two large non-coding intervals, 1,511 kilobases and 845 kilobases in length, from the mouse genome. Viable mice homozygous for the deletions were generated and were indistinguishable from wild-type littermates with regard to morphology, reproductive fitness, growth, longevity and a variety of parameters assaying general homeostasis. Further detailed analysis of the expression of multiple genes bracketing the deletions revealed only minor expression differences in homozygous deletion and wild-type mice. Together, the two deleted segments harbour 1,243 non-coding sequences conserved between humans and rodents (more than 100 base pairs, 70% identity). Some of the deleted sequences might encode for functions unidentified in our screen; nonetheless, these studies further support the existence of potentially ‘disposable DNA’ in the genomes of mammals.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcelo A. Nóbrega & Yiwen Zhu & Ingrid Plajzer-Frick & Veena Afzal & Edward M. Rubin, 2004. "Megabase deletions of gene deserts result in viable mice," Nature, Nature, vol. 431(7011), pages 988-993, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:431:y:2004:i:7011:d:10.1038_nature03022
    DOI: 10.1038/nature03022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature03022
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature03022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samuel Abassah-Oppong & Matteo Zoia & Brandon J. Mannion & Raquel Rouco & Virginie Tissières & Cailyn H. Spurrell & Virginia Roland & Fabrice Darbellay & Anja Itum & Julie Gamart & Tabitha A. Festa-Da, 2024. "A gene desert required for regulatory control of pleiotropic Shox2 expression and embryonic survival," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Noah Dukler & Mehreen R. Mughal & Ritika Ramani & Yi-Fei Huang & Adam Siepel, 2022. "Extreme purifying selection against point mutations in the human genome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Andrea Wilderman & Eva D’haene & Machteld Baetens & Tara N. Yankee & Emma Wentworth Winchester & Nicole Glidden & Ellen Roets & Jo Dorpe & Sandra Janssens & Danny E. Miller & Miranda Galey & Kari M. B, 2024. "A distant global control region is essential for normal expression of anterior HOXA genes during mouse and human craniofacial development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:431:y:2004:i:7011:d:10.1038_nature03022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.