IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v417y2002i6888d10.1038_417541a.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Single-species models for many-species food webs

Author

Listed:
  • W. W. Murdoch

    (University of California)

  • B. E. Kendall

    (University of California)

  • R. M. Nisbet

    (University of California)

  • C. J. Briggs

    (University of California)

  • E. McCauley

    (University of Calgary)

  • R. Bolser

    (University of California)

Abstract

Most species live in species-rich food webs; yet, for a century, most mathematical models for population dynamics have included only one or two species1,2,3. We ask whether such models are relevant to the real world. Two-species population models of an interacting consumer and resource collapse to one-species dynamics when recruitment to the resource population is unrelated to resource abundance, thereby weakening the coupling between consumer and resource4,5,6. We predict that, in nature, generalist consumers that feed on many species should similarly show one-species dynamics. We test this prediction using cyclic populations, in which it is easier to infer underlying mechanisms7, and which are widespread in nature8. Here we show that one-species cycles can be distinguished from consumer–resource cycles by their periods. We then analyse a large number of time series from cyclic populations in nature and show that almost all cycling, generalist consumers examined have periods that are consistent with one-species dynamics. Thus generalist consumers indeed behave as if they were one-species populations, and a one-species model is a valid representation for generalist population dynamics in many-species food webs.

Suggested Citation

  • W. W. Murdoch & B. E. Kendall & R. M. Nisbet & C. J. Briggs & E. McCauley & R. Bolser, 2002. "Single-species models for many-species food webs," Nature, Nature, vol. 417(6888), pages 541-543, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:417:y:2002:i:6888:d:10.1038_417541a
    DOI: 10.1038/417541a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/417541a
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/417541a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nisbet, Roger M. & Martin, Benjamin T. & de Roos, Andre M., 2016. "Integrating ecological insight derived from individual-based simulations and physiologically structured population models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 101-112.
    2. Colon, C. & Claessen, D. & Ghil, M., 2015. "Bifurcation analysis of an agent-based model for predator–prey interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 317(C), pages 93-106.
    3. Cobbold, Christina A. & Roland, Jens & Lewis, Mark A., 2009. "The impact of parasitoid emergence time on host–parasitoid population dynamics," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 201-215.
    4. Abbott, Karen C. & Morris, William F. & Gross, Kevin, 2008. "Simultaneous effects of food limitation and inducible resistance on herbivore population dynamics," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 63-78.
    5. Sylvie Geisendorf & Christian Klippert, 2022. "Integrated sustainability policy assessment – an agent-based ecological-economic model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 1017-1048, July.
    6. Barraquand, Frédéric & Gimenez, Olivier, 2019. "Integrating multiple data sources to fit matrix population models for interacting species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).
    7. Pfaff, T. & Brechtel, A. & Drossel, B. & Guill, C., 2014. "Single generation cycles and delayed feedback cycles are not separate phenomena," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 38-47.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:417:y:2002:i:6888:d:10.1038_417541a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.