IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v407y2000i6800d10.1038_35024082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells

Author

Listed:
  • Irina A. Polejaeva

    (PPL Therapeutics Incorporated)

  • Shu-Hung Chen

    (PPL Therapeutics Incorporated)

  • Todd D. Vaught

    (PPL Therapeutics Incorporated)

  • Raymond L. Page

    (PPL Therapeutics Incorporated)

  • June Mullins

    (PPL Therapeutics Incorporated)

  • Suyapa Ball

    (PPL Therapeutics Incorporated)

  • Yifan Dai

    (PPL Therapeutics Incorporated)

  • Jeremy Boone

    (PPL Therapeutics Incorporated)

  • Shawn Walker

    (PPL Therapeutics Incorporated)

  • David L. Ayares

    (PPL Therapeutics Incorporated)

  • Alan Colman

    (PPL Therapeutics)

  • Keith H. S. Campbell

    (PPL Therapeutics
    University of Nottingham, School of Biosciences)

Abstract

Since the first report of live mammals produced by nuclear transfer from a cultured differentiated cell population in 1995 (ref. 1), successful development has been obtained in sheep2,3, cattle4, mice5 and goats6 using a variety of somatic cell types as nuclear donors. The methodology used for embryo reconstruction in each of these species is essentially similar: diploid donor nuclei have been transplanted into enucleated MII oocytes that are activated on, or after transfer. In sheep2 and goat6 pre-activated oocytes have also proved successful as cytoplast recipients. The reconstructed embryos are then cultured and selected embryos transferred to surrogate recipients for development to term. In pigs, nuclear transfer has been significantly less successful; a single piglet was reported after transfer of a blastomere nucleus from a four-cell embryo to an enucleated oocyte7; however, no live offspring were obtained in studies using somatic cells such as diploid or mitotic fetal fibroblasts as nuclear donors8,9. The development of embryos reconstructed by nuclear transfer is dependent upon a range of factors. Here we investigate some of these factors and report the successful production of cloned piglets from a cultured adult somatic cell population using a new nuclear transfer procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina A. Polejaeva & Shu-Hung Chen & Todd D. Vaught & Raymond L. Page & June Mullins & Suyapa Ball & Yifan Dai & Jeremy Boone & Shawn Walker & David L. Ayares & Alan Colman & Keith H. S. Campbell, 2000. "Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells," Nature, Nature, vol. 407(6800), pages 86-90, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:407:y:2000:i:6800:d:10.1038_35024082
    DOI: 10.1038/35024082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35024082
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35024082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhaodi Liao & Jixiang Zhang & Shiyu Sun & Yuzhuo Li & Yuting Xu & Chunyang Li & Jing Cao & Yanhong Nie & Zhuoyue Niu & Jingwen Liu & Falong Lu & Zhen Liu & Qiang Sun, 2024. "Reprogramming mechanism dissection and trophoblast replacement application in monkey somatic cell nuclear transfer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:407:y:2000:i:6800:d:10.1038_35024082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.