IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v405y2000i6785d10.1038_35013106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus

Author

Listed:
  • Amy T. Hark

    (Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biology Princeton University)

  • Christopher J. Schoenherr

    (Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biology Princeton University)

  • David J. Katz

    (Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biology Princeton University)

  • Robert S. Ingram

    (Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biology Princeton University)

  • John M. Levorse

    (Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biology Princeton University)

  • Shirley M. Tilghman

    (Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biology Princeton University)

Abstract

The Insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) and H19 genes are imprinted, resulting in silencing of the maternal and paternal alleles, respectively. This event is dependent upon an imprinted-control region two kilobases upstream of H19 (refs 1, 2). On the paternal chromosome this element is methylated and required for the silencing of H19 (refs 2,3,4). On the maternal chromosome the region is unmethylated and required for silencing of the Igf2 gene 90 kilobases upstream2. We have proposed that the unmethylated imprinted-control region acts as a chromatin boundary that blocks the interaction of Igf2 with enhancers that lie 3′ of H19 (refs 5, 6). This enhancer-blocking activity would then be lost when the region was methylated, thereby allowing expression of Igf2 paternally. Here we show, using transgenic mice and tissue culture, that the unmethylated imprinted-control regions from mouse and human H19 exhibit enhancer-blocking activity. Furthermore, we show that CTCF, a zinc finger protein implicated in vertebrate boundary function7, binds to several sites in the unmethylated imprinted-control region that are essential for enhancer blocking. Consistent with our model, CTCF binding is abolished by DNA methylation. This is the first example, to our knowledge, of a regulated chromatin boundary in vertebrates.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy T. Hark & Christopher J. Schoenherr & David J. Katz & Robert S. Ingram & John M. Levorse & Shirley M. Tilghman, 2000. "CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6785), pages 486-489, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:405:y:2000:i:6785:d:10.1038_35013106
    DOI: 10.1038/35013106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35013106
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35013106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jill Pilet & Theo Z. Hirsch & Barkha Gupta & Amélie Roehrig & Guillaume Morcrette & Aurore Pire & Eric Letouzé & Brice Fresneau & Sophie Taque & Laurence Brugières & Sophie Branchereau & Christophe Ch, 2023. "Preneoplastic liver colonization by 11p15.5 altered mosaic cells in young children with hepatoblastoma," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Roger Mulet-Lazaro & Stanley Herk & Margit Nuetzel & Aniko Sijs-Szabo & Noelia Díaz & Katherine Kelly & Claudia Erpelinck-Verschueren & Lucia Schwarzfischer-Pfeilschifter & Hanna Stanewsky & Ute Acker, 2024. "Epigenetic alterations affecting hematopoietic regulatory networks as drivers of mixed myeloid/lymphoid leukemia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:405:y:2000:i:6785:d:10.1038_35013106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.