IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v392y1998i6673d10.1038_32688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel P. Cahill

    (The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Program in Human Genetics, and The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)

  • Christoph Lengauer

    (The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Program in Human Genetics, and The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)

  • Jian Yu

    (The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Program in Human Genetics, and The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)

  • Gregory J. Riggins

    (The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Program in Human Genetics, and The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)

  • James K. V. Willson

    (Case Western Reserve University and The Howard Hughes Medical Institute)

  • Sanford D. Markowitz

    (Case Western Reserve University and The Howard Hughes Medical Institute)

  • Kenneth W. Kinzler

    (The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Program in Human Genetics, and The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)

  • Bert Vogelstein

    (The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Program in Human Genetics, and The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)

Abstract

Genetic instability was one of the first characteristics to be postulated to underlie neoplasia1,2,3. Such genetic instability occurs in two different forms. In a small fraction of colorectal and some other cancers, defective repair of mismatched bases results in an increased mutation rate at the nucleotide level and consequent widespread microsatellite instability4,5,6,7. In most colorectal cancers, and probably in many other cancer types, a chromosomal instability (CIN) leading to an abnormal chromosome number (aneuploidy) is observed8. The physiological and molecular bases of this pervasive abnormality are unknown. Here we show that CIN is consistently associated with the loss of function of a mitotic checkpoint. Moreover, in some cancers displaying CIN the loss of this checkpoint was associated with the mutational inactivation of a human homologue of the yeast BUB1 gene; BUB1 controls mitotic checkpoints and chromosome segregation in yeast. The normal mitotic checkpoints of cells displaying microsatellite instability become defective upon transfer of mutant hBUB1 alleles from either of two CIN cancers.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel P. Cahill & Christoph Lengauer & Jian Yu & Gregory J. Riggins & James K. V. Willson & Sanford D. Markowitz & Kenneth W. Kinzler & Bert Vogelstein, 1998. "Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers," Nature, Nature, vol. 392(6673), pages 300-303, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:392:y:1998:i:6673:d:10.1038_32688
    DOI: 10.1038/32688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/32688
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/32688?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Urbashi Basnet & Abhijeet R. Patil & Aditi Kulkarni & Sourav Roy, 2021. "Role of Stress-Survival Pathways and Transcriptomic Alterations in Progression of Colorectal Cancer: A Health Disparities Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:392:y:1998:i:6673:d:10.1038_32688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.