IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v391y1998i6662d10.1038_34166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest

Author

Listed:
  • J. H. Lawton

    (NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College, Silwood Park)

  • D. E. Bignell

    (School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London
    University of Malaysia Sabah)

  • B. Bolton

    (The Natural History Museum)

  • G. F. Bloemers

    (NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College, Silwood Park
    The Natural History Museum
    Plant Health Group)

  • P. Eggleton

    (The Natural History Museum)

  • P. M. Hammond

    (The Natural History Museum)

  • M. Hodda

    (The Natural History Museum
    Australian National Insect Collection)

  • R. D. Holt

    (Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas)

  • T. B. Larsen

    (358 Coldharbour Lane)

  • N. A. Mawdsley

    (NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College, Silwood Park
    The Natural History Museum
    University of Leeds)

  • N. E. Stork

    (The Natural History Museum
    Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management)

  • D. S. Srivastava

    (NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College, Silwood Park
    University of British Columbia)

  • A. D. Watt

    (Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Bush Estate)

Abstract

Despite concern about the effects of tropical forest disturbance and clearance on biodiversity1,2, data on impacts, particularly on invertebrates, remain scarce3,4,5,6,7,8. Here we report a taxonomically diverse inventory on the impacts of tropical forest modification at one locality. We examined a gradient from near-primary, through old-growth secondary and plantation forests to complete clearance, for eight animal groups (birds, butterflies, flying beetles, canopy beetles, canopy ants, leaf-litter ants, termites and soil nematodes) in the Mbalmayo Forest Reserve, south-central Cameroon. Although species richness generally declined with increasing disturbance, no one group serves as a good indicator taxon9,10,11,12 for changes in the species richness of other groups. Species replacement from site to site (turnover) along the gradient also differs between taxonomic groups. The proportion of ‘morphospecies’ that cannot be assigned to named species and the number of ‘scientist-hours’ required to process samples both increase dramatically for smaller-bodied taxa. Data from these eight groups indicate the huge scale of the biological effort required to provide inventories of tropical diversity, and to measure the impacts of tropical forest modification and clearance.

Suggested Citation

  • J. H. Lawton & D. E. Bignell & B. Bolton & G. F. Bloemers & P. Eggleton & P. M. Hammond & M. Hodda & R. D. Holt & T. B. Larsen & N. A. Mawdsley & N. E. Stork & D. S. Srivastava & A. D. Watt, 1998. "Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest," Nature, Nature, vol. 391(6662), pages 72-76, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:391:y:1998:i:6662:d:10.1038_34166
    DOI: 10.1038/34166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/34166
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/34166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A.S. Duden & P.A. Verweij & A.P.C. Faaij & D. Baisero & C. Rondinini & F. van der Hilst, 2020. "Biodiversity Impacts of Increased Ethanol Production in Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Yuxin Qi & Yuandong Hu, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Variation and Driving Factors Analysis of Habitat Quality: A Case Study in Harbin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Benjamin T. Phalan, 2018. "What Have We Learned from the Land Sparing-sharing Model?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Fischer, Rico & Bohn, Friedrich & Dantas de Paula, Mateus & Dislich, Claudia & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Gutiérrez, Alvaro G. & Kazmierczak, Martin & Knapp, Nikolai & Lehmann, Sebastian & Paulick, Sebastia, 2016. "Lessons learned from applying a forest gap model to understand ecosystem and carbon dynamics of complex tropical forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 124-133.
    5. Andreas Freytag & Christoph Vietze, 2013. "Can nature promote development? The role of sustainable tourism for economic growth," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 16-44, March.
    6. Juutinen, Artti & Monkkonen, Mikko, 2004. "Testing alternative indicators for biodiversity conservation in old-growth boreal forests: ecology and economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1-2), pages 35-48, September.
    7. Nghiem, Nhung, 2014. "Optimal rotation age for carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation in Vietnam," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 56-64.
    8. Poonam Tripathi & Mukund Dev Behera & Partha Sarathi Roy, 2017. "Optimized grid representation of plant species richness in India—Utility of an existing national database in integrated ecological analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Nghiem, Nhung, 2016. "Optimal forest rotation for carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation by farm income levels," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 185-194.
    10. Ranjith P. Udawatta & Lalith Rankoth & Shibu Jose, 2019. "Agroforestry and Biodiversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:391:y:1998:i:6662:d:10.1038_34166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.