IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v389y1997i6648d10.1038_38487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception

Author

Listed:
  • B. G. Cumming

    (University Laboratory of Physiology)

  • A. J. Parker

    (University Laboratory of Physiology)

Abstract

The identification of brain regions that are associated with the conscious perception of visual stimuli is a major goal in neuroscience1. Here we present a test of whether the signals on neurons in cortical area V1 correspond directly to our conscious perception of binocular stereoscopic depth. Depth perception requires that image features on one retina are first matched with appropriate features on the other retina. The mechanisms that perform this matching can be examined by using random-dot stereograms2, in which the left and right eyes view randomly positioned but binocularly correlated dots. We exploit the fact that anticorrelated random-dot stereograms (in which dots in one eye are matched geometrically to dots of the opposite contrast in the other eye) do not give rise to the perception of depth3 because the matching process does not find a consistent solution. Anticorrelated random-dot stereograms contain binocular features that could excite neurons that have not solved the correspondence problem. We demonstrate that disparity-selective neurons in V1 signal the disparity of anticorrelated random-dot stereograms, indicating that they do not unambiguously signal stereoscopic depth. Hence single V1 neurons cannot account for the conscious perception of stereopsis, although combining the outputs of many V1 neurons could solve the matching problem. The accompanying paper4 suggests an additional function for disparity signals from V1: they may be important for the rapid involuntary control of vergence eye movements (eye movements that bring the images on the two foveae into register).

Suggested Citation

  • B. G. Cumming & A. J. Parker, 1997. "Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception," Nature, Nature, vol. 389(6648), pages 280-283, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:389:y:1997:i:6648:d:10.1038_38487
    DOI: 10.1038/38487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/38487
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/38487?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antoine Barbot & Anasuya Das & Michael D. Melnick & Matthew R. Cavanaugh & Elisha P. Merriam & David J. Heeger & Krystel R. Huxlin, 2021. "Spared perilesional V1 activity underlies training-induced recovery of luminance detection sensitivity in cortically-blind patients," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Maria Solé Puig & Laura Pérez Zapata & J Antonio Aznar-Casanova & Hans Supèr, 2013. "A Role of Eye Vergence in Covert Attention," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Rebecca L Hornsey & Paul B Hibbard & Peter Scarfe, 2016. "Binocular Depth Judgments on Smoothly Curved Surfaces," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Gross, Eitan, 2015. "Classification error analysis in stereo vision," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 430(C), pages 1-10.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:389:y:1997:i:6648:d:10.1038_38487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.