IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v4y2021i11d10.1038_s41893-021-00755-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Six modes of co-production for sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Josephine M. Chambers

    (Wageningen University
    Luc Hoffmann Institute, IUCN Conservation Centre
    University of Cambridge)

  • Carina Wyborn

    (Luc Hoffmann Institute, IUCN Conservation Centre
    Australian National University)

  • Melanie E. Ryan

    (Luc Hoffmann Institute, IUCN Conservation Centre)

  • Robin S. Reid

    (Colorado State University)

  • Maraja Riechers

    (Leuphana University of Lüneburg)

  • Anca Serban

    (Luc Hoffmann Institute, IUCN Conservation Centre)

  • Nathan J. Bennett

    (University of British Columbia
    The Peopled Seas Initiative)

  • Christopher Cvitanovic

    (Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, Australian National University
    Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania)

  • María E. Fernández-Giménez

    (Colorado State University)

  • Kathleen A. Galvin

    (Colorado State University)

  • Bruce E. Goldstein

    (University of Colorado Boulder)

  • Nicole L. Klenk

    (University of Toronto)

  • Maria Tengö

    (Stockholm University)

  • Ruth Brennan

    (Trinity College Dublin)

  • Jessica J. Cockburn

    (Rhodes University)

  • Rosemary Hill

    (CSIRO Land and Water
    James Cook University)

  • Claudia Munera

    (Australian National University)

  • Jeanne L. Nel

    (Nelson Mandela University
    Wageningen University & Research)

  • Henrik Österblom

    (Stockholm University)

  • Angela T. Bednarek

    (The Pew Charitable Trusts)

  • Elena M. Bennett

    (McGill University)

  • Amos Brandeis

    (Architecture, Urban & Regional Planning, LTD)

  • Lakshmi Charli-Joseph

    (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México)

  • Paul Chatterton

    (University of Leeds)

  • K. Curran

    (The Pew Charitable Trusts)

  • Pongchai Dumrongrojwatthana

    (Chulalongkorn University)

  • América Paz Durán

    (Universidad Austral de Chile
    Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad)

  • Salamatu J. Fada

    (Bangor University
    University of Jos)

  • Jean-David Gerber

    (University of Bern)

  • Jonathan M. H. Green

    (University of York)

  • Angela M. Guerrero

    (Stockholm University)

  • Tobias Haller

    (University of Bern)

  • Andra-Ioana Horcea-Milcu

    (Babeş-Bolyai University)

  • Beria Leimona

    (World Agroforestry (ICRAF))

  • Jasper Montana

    (University of Oxford)

  • Renee Rondeau

    (Colorado Natural Heritage Program)

  • Marja Spierenburg

    (Leiden University
    Stellenbosch University)

  • Patrick Steyaert

    (UPEM LISIS INRA)

  • Julie G. Zaehringer

    (University of Bern)

  • Rebecca Gruby

    (Colorado State University)

  • Jon Hutton

    (Luc Hoffmann Institute, IUCN Conservation Centre
    WWF International)

  • Tomas Pickering

    (Colorado State University)

Abstract

The promise of co-production to address complex sustainability challenges is compelling. Yet, co-production, the collaborative weaving of research and practice, encompasses diverse aims, terminologies and practices, with poor clarity over their implications. To explore this diversity, we systematically mapped differences in how 32 initiatives from 6 continents co-produce diverse outcomes for the sustainable development of ecosystems at local to global scales. We found variation in their purpose for utilizing co-production, understanding of power, approach to politics and pathways to impact. A cluster analysis identified six modes of co-production: (1) researching solutions; (2) empowering voices; (3) brokering power; (4) reframing power; (5) navigating differences and (6) reframing agency. No mode is ideal; each holds unique potential to achieve particular outcomes, but also poses unique challenges and risks. Our analysis provides a heuristic tool for researchers and societal actors to critically explore this diversity and effectively navigate trade-offs when co-producing sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Josephine M. Chambers & Carina Wyborn & Melanie E. Ryan & Robin S. Reid & Maraja Riechers & Anca Serban & Nathan J. Bennett & Christopher Cvitanovic & María E. Fernández-Giménez & Kathleen A. Galvin &, 2021. "Six modes of co-production for sustainability," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(11), pages 983-996, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:4:y:2021:i:11:d:10.1038_s41893-021-00755-x
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-021-00755-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ortiz-Przychodzka, Stefan & Benavides-Frías, Camila & Raymond, Christopher M. & Díaz-Reviriego, Isabel & Hanspach, Jan, 2023. "Rethinking Economic Practices and Values As Assemblages of More-Than-Human Relations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Scaini, Anna & Mulligan, Joseph & Berg, Håkan & Brangarí, Albert & Bukachi, Vera & Carenzo, Sebastian & Chau Thi, Da & Courtney-Mustaphi, Colin & Ekblom, Anneli & Fjelde, Hanne & Fridahl, Mathias & Ha, 2024. "Pathways from research to sustainable development: insights from ten research projects in sustainability and resilience," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122096, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Kılkış, Şiir & Ulpiani, Giulia & Vetters, Nadja, 2024. "Visions for climate neutrality and opportunities for co-learning in European cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Lecegui, Antonio & Olaizola, Ana María & López-i-Gelats, Feliu & Varela, Elsa, 2022. "Implementing the livelihood resilience framework: An indicator-based model for assessing mountain pastoral farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. D'Amato, D. & Korhonen-Kurki, K. & Lyytikainen, V. & Matthies, B.D. & Horcea-Milcu, A-I., 2022. "Circular bioeconomy: Actors and dynamics of knowledge co-production in Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Masahiko Haraguchi & Akihiko Nishino & Akira Kodaka & Maura Allaire & Upmanu Lall & Liao Kuei-Hsien & Kaya Onda & Kota Tsubouchi & Naohiko Kohtake, 2022. "Human mobility data and analysis for urban resilience: A systematic review," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(5), pages 1507-1535, June.
    7. Hugo Gaspar Hernandez-Palma & Jonny Rafael Plaza Alvarado & Jesús Enrique García Guiliany & Guilherme Luiz Dotto & Claudete Gindri Ramos, 2024. "Implications of Machine Learning in the Generation of Renewable Energies in Latin America from a Globalized Vision: A Systematic Review," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 1-10, March.
    8. Jakku, E. & Fleming, A. & Espig, M. & Fielke, S. & Finlay-Smits, S.C. & Turner, J.A., 2023. "Disruption disrupted? Reflecting on the relationship between responsible innovation and digital agriculture research and development at multiple levels in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    9. Choi, Sanghak, 2024. "Climate change exposure and the use of short-term debt," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Mohammed Basheer & Victor Nechifor & Alvaro Calzadilla & Claudia Ringler & David Hulme & Julien J. Harou, 2022. "Balancing national economic policy outcomes for sustainable development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Roh, Taewoo & Xiao, Shufeng (Simon) & Park, Byung Il, 2024. "MNEs' capabilities and their sustainable business in emerging markets: Evidence from MNE subsidiaries in China," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    12. Gerlak, Andrea K. & Guido, Zack & Owen, Gigi & McGoffin, Mariana Sofia Rodriguez & Louder, Elena & Davies, Julia & Smith, Kelly Jay & Zimmer, Andy & Murveit, Anna M. & Meadow, Alison & Shrestha, Padme, 2023. "Stakeholder engagement in the co-production of knowledge for environmental decision-making," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:4:y:2021:i:11:d:10.1038_s41893-021-00755-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.