IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v2y2019i6d10.1038_s41893-019-0306-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Well-being outcomes of marine protected areas

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie C. Ban

    (University of Victoria)

  • Georgina Grace Gurney

    (James Cook University)

  • Nadine A. Marshall

    (CSIRO Land and Water)

  • Charlotte K. Whitney

    (University of Victoria)

  • Morena Mills

    (Imperial College London)

  • Stefan Gelcich

    (Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile)

  • Nathan J. Bennett

    (University of British Columbia
    Stanford University
    University of Nice Sophia Antipolis)

  • Mairi C. Meehan

    (Memorial University of Newfoundland)

  • Caroline Butler

    (Gitxaala Nation Fisheries Program)

  • Stephen Ban

    (Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy)

  • Tanya C. Tran

    (University of Victoria)

  • Michael E. Cox

    (Dartmouth College)

  • Sara Jo Breslow

    (University of Washington)

Abstract

Marine protected areas are advocated as a key strategy for simultaneously protecting marine biodiversity and supporting coastal livelihoods, but their implementation can be challenging for numerous reasons, including perceived negative effects on human well-being. We synthesized research from 118 peer-reviewed articles that analyse outcomes related to marine protected areas on people, and found that half of documented well-being outcomes were positive and about one-third were negative. No-take, well-enforced and old marine protected areas had positive human well-being outcomes, which aligns with most findings from ecological studies. Marine protected areas with single zones had more positive effects on human well-being than areas with multiple zones. Most studies focused on economic and governance aspects of well-being, leaving social, health and cultural domains understudied. Well-being outcomes arose from direct effects of marine protected area governance processes or management actions and from indirect effects mediated by changes in the ecosystem. Our findings illustrate that both human well-being and biodiversity conservation can be improved through marine protected areas, yet negative impacts commonly co-occur with benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie C. Ban & Georgina Grace Gurney & Nadine A. Marshall & Charlotte K. Whitney & Morena Mills & Stefan Gelcich & Nathan J. Bennett & Mairi C. Meehan & Caroline Butler & Stephen Ban & Tanya C. Tran, 2019. "Well-being outcomes of marine protected areas," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(6), pages 524-532, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:2:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1038_s41893-019-0306-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0306-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-0306-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-019-0306-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Mouillot & Laure Velez & Camille Albouy & Nicolas Casajus & Joachim Claudet & Vincent Delbar & Rodolphe Devillers & Tom B. Letessier & Nicolas Loiseau & Stéphanie Manel & Laura Mannocci & Jessic, 2024. "The socioeconomic and environmental niche of protected areas reveals global conservation gaps and opportunities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Haenssgen, Marco J. & Savage, Jessica & Yeboah, Godwin & Charoenboon, Nutcha & Srenh, Sorn, 2021. "In a network of lines that intersect: The socio-economic development impact of marine resource management and conservation in Southeast Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. World Bank, 2021. "Banking on Protected Areas," World Bank Publications - Reports 35737, The World Bank Group.
    4. Muhammad HANRI & Andhika PRATAMA & Lili YUNITA & Atiqah SIREGAR & Chairina SIREGAR & Wildan ANKY, 2023. "The Benefits of Marine Protected Areas in Fighting Inequality and Fostering Environmental Sustainability in Indonesia," Working Paper 27581728-cd76-4c3f-9200-6, Agence française de développement.
    5. Daniel F. Viana & David Gill & Alex Zvoleff & Nils C. Krueck & Jessica Zamborain-Mason & Christopher M. Free & Alon Shepon & Dana Grieco & Josef Schmidhuber & Michael B. Mascia & Christopher D. Golden, 2024. "Sustainable-use marine protected areas to improve human nutrition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Vanessa Hull & Christian J. Rivera & Chad Wong, 2019. "A Synthesis of Opportunities for Applying the Telecoupling Framework to Marine Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Changjun Gu & Pei Zhao & Qiong Chen & Shicheng Li & Lanhui Li & Linshan Liu & Yili Zhang, 2020. "Forest Cover Change and the Effectiveness of Protected Areas in the Himalaya since 1998," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Fabio De Matteis & Giovanni Notaristefano & Piervito Bianchi, 2021. "Public—Private Partnership Governance for Accessible Tourism in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Buonocore, Elvira & Appolloni, Luca & Russo, Giovanni F. & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2020. "Assessing natural capital value in marine ecosystems through an environmental accounting model: A case study in Southern Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 419(C).
    10. Kreg Lindberg & Tommy Swearingen & Eric M. White, 2020. "Parallel Subjective Well-Being and Choice Experiment Evaluation of Ecosystem Services: Marine and Forest Reserves in Coastal Oregon, USA," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 347-374, May.
    11. Sena-Vittini, Mildred & Gomez-Valenzuela, Victor & Ramirez, Katerin, 2023. "Social perceptions and conservation in protected areas: Taking stock of the literature," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Rasheed, A. Rifaee, 2020. "Marine protected areas and human well-being – A systematic review and recommendations," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    13. Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi & Amanda E. Bates & Giovanni Strona & Fabio Bulleri & Barbara Horta e Costa & Graham J. Edgar & Bernat Hereu & Dan C. Reed & Rick D. Stuart-Smith & Neville S. Barrett & David, 2024. "Marine protected areas promote stability of reef fish communities under climate warming," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Mangubhai, Sangeeta & Sykes, Helen & Manley, Marita & Vukikomoala, Kiji & Beattie, Madeline, 2020. "Contributions of tourism-based Marine Conservation Agreements to natural resource management in Fiji," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    15. Zhenggen Fan & Ji Liu & Hu Yu & Hua Lu & Puwei Zhang, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Pattern and Influencing Factors of Land Ecological Carrying Capacity in The National Pilot Zones for Ecological Conservation in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Raphael Seguin & David Mouillot & Joshua E. Cinner & Rick D. Stuart Smith & Eva Maire & Nicholas A. J. Graham & Matthew McLean & Laurent Vigliola & Nicolas Loiseau, 2023. "Towards process-oriented management of tropical reefs in the anthropocene," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 148-157, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:2:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1038_s41893-019-0306-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.