IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v1y2018i9d10.1038_s41893-018-0138-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Balmford

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Tatsuya Amano

    (University of Cambridge
    University of Cambridge)

  • Harriet Bartlett

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Dave Chadwick

    (Environment Centre Wales)

  • Adrian Collins

    (Rothamsted Research)

  • David Edwards

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Rob Field

    (The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds)

  • Philip Garnsworthy

    (University of Nottingham)

  • Rhys Green

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Pete Smith

    (University of Aberdeen)

  • Helen Waters

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Andrew Whitmore

    (Rothamsted Research)

  • Donald M. Broom

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Julian Chara

    (Centre for Research on Sustainable Agricultural Production Systems)

  • Tom Finch

    (University of Cambridge
    The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds)

  • Emma Garnett

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Alfred Gathorne-Hardy

    (University of Edinburgh
    University of Edinburgh
    Somerville College)

  • Juan Hernandez-Medrano

    (National Autonomous University of Mexico)

  • Mario Herrero

    (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation)

  • Fangyuan Hua

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Agnieszka Latawiec

    (Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)
    University of Agriculture in Kraków)

  • Tom Misselbrook

    (Rothamsted Research)

  • Ben Phalan

    (University of Cambridge
    Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo)

  • Benno I. Simmons

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Taro Takahashi

    (Rothamsted Research
    University of Bristol)

  • James Vause

    (UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre)

  • Erasmus Ermgassen

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Rowan Eisner

    (University of Cambridge)

Abstract

How we manage farming and food systems to meet rising demand is pivotal to the future of biodiversity. Extensive field data suggest that impacts on wild populations would be greatly reduced through boosting yields on existing farmland so as to spare remaining natural habitats. High-yield farming raises other concerns because expressed per unit area it can generate high levels of externalities such as greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient losses. However, such metrics underestimate the overall impacts of lower-yield systems. Here we develop a framework that instead compares externality and land costs per unit production. We apply this framework to diverse data sets that describe the externalities of four major farm sectors and reveal that, rather than involving trade-offs, the externality and land costs of alternative production systems can covary positively: per unit production, land-efficient systems often produce lower externalities. For greenhouse gas emissions, these associations become more strongly positive once forgone sequestration is included. Our conclusions are limited: remarkably few studies report externalities alongside yields; many important externalities and farming systems are inadequately measured; and realizing the environmental benefits of high-yield systems typically requires additional measures to limit farmland expansion. Nevertheless, our results suggest that trade-offs among key cost metrics are not as ubiquitous as sometimes perceived.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Balmford & Tatsuya Amano & Harriet Bartlett & Dave Chadwick & Adrian Collins & David Edwards & Rob Field & Philip Garnsworthy & Rhys Green & Pete Smith & Helen Waters & Andrew Whitmore & Donald, 2018. "The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(9), pages 477-485, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:1:y:2018:i:9:d:10.1038_s41893-018-0138-5
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-018-0138-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-018-0138-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-018-0138-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. França, Filipe & Solar, Ricardo & Lees, Alexander C. & Martins, Lucas Pereira & Berenguer, Erika & Barlow, Jos, 2021. "Reassessing the role of cattle and pasture in Brazil's deforestation: A response to “Fire, deforestation, and livestock: When the smoke clears”," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. de Boer, Joop & Aiking, Harry, 2021. "Climate change and species decline: Distinct sources of European consumer concern supporting more sustainable diets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Abeygunawardane, Dilini & Kronenburg García, Angela & Sun, Zhanli & Müller, Daniel & Sitoe, Almeida & Meyfroidt, Patrick, 2022. "Resource frontiers and agglomeration economies: The varied logics of transnational land-based investing in Southern and Eastern Africa," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 51(6), pages 1535-1551.
    4. Song, Xiaoqing & Wang, Xiong & Hu, Shougeng & Xiao, Renbin & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2022. "Functional transition of cultivated ecosystems: Underlying mechanisms and policy implications in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Arnott, David & Chadwick, David R. & Wynne-Jones, Sophie & Jones, David L., 2021. "Vulnerability of British farms to post-Brexit subsidy removal, and implications for intensification, extensification and land sparing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. M. H. Easdale & C. L. Michel & D. Perri, 2023. "Biocultural heritage of transhumant territories," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(1), pages 53-64, March.
    7. Chiarella, Cristina & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Abeygunawardane, Dilini & Conforti, Piero, 2023. "Balancing the trade-offs between land productivity, labor productivity and labor intensity," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 52(10), pages 1618-1634.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:1:y:2018:i:9:d:10.1038_s41893-018-0138-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.