IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v1y2018i5d10.1038_s41893-018-0062-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate-smart sustainable agriculture in low-to-intermediate shade agroforests

Author

Listed:
  • W. J. Blaser

    (ETH Zurich)

  • J. Oppong

    (Council for Scientific and Industrial Research – Soil Research Institute)

  • S. P. Hart

    (ETH Zurich)

  • J. Landolt

    (ETH Zurich)

  • E. Yeboah

    (Council for Scientific and Industrial Research – Soil Research Institute)

  • J. Six

    (ETH Zurich)

Abstract

Meeting demands for agricultural production while maintaining ecosystem services, mitigating and adapting to climate change and conserving biodiversity will be a defining challenge of this century. Crop production in agroforests is being widely implemented with the expectation that it can simultaneously meet each of these goals. But trade-offs are inherent to agroforestry and so unless implemented with levels of canopy cover that optimize these trade-offs, this effort in climate-smart, sustainable intensification may simply compromise both production and ecosystem services. By combining simultaneous measurements of production, soil fertility, disease, climate variables, carbon storage and species diversity along a shade-tree cover gradient, here we show that low-to-intermediate shade cocoa agroforests in West Africa do not compromise production, while creating benefits for climate adaptation, climate mitigation and biodiversity. As shade-tree cover increases above approximately 30%, agroforests become increasingly less likely to generate win–win scenarios. Our results demonstrate that agroforests cannot simultaneously maximize production, climate and sustainability goals but might optimise the trade-off between these goals at low-to-intermediate levels of cover.

Suggested Citation

  • W. J. Blaser & J. Oppong & S. P. Hart & J. Landolt & E. Yeboah & J. Six, 2018. "Climate-smart sustainable agriculture in low-to-intermediate shade agroforests," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(5), pages 234-239, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:1:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1038_s41893-018-0062-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-018-0062-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-018-0062-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-018-0062-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alice Fitch & Rebecca L. Rowe & Niall P. McNamara & Cahyo Prayogo & Rizky Maulana Ishaq & Rizki Dwi Prasetyo & Zak Mitchell & Simon Oakley & Laurence Jones, 2022. "The Coffee Compromise: Is Agricultural Expansion into Tree Plantations a Sustainable Option?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Thomas Cherico Wanger & Francis Dennig & Manuel Toledo-Hern'andez & Teja Tscharntke & Eric F. Lambin, 2021. "Cocoa pollination, biodiversity-friendly production, and the global market," Papers 2112.02877, arXiv.org.
    3. Miller, Daniel C. & Cheek, Jennifer Zavaleta & Mansourian, Stephanie & Wildburger, Christoph, 2022. "Forests, trees and the eradication of poverty," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Luzian Messmer & Braida Thom & Pius Kruetli & Evans Dawoe & Kebebew Assefa & Johan Six & Jonas Joerin, 2021. "Beyond feasibility—the role of motivation to implement measures to enhance resilience," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Priscilla Wainaina & Peter A. Minang & Lalisa Duguma & Kennedy Muthee, 2021. "A Review of the Trade-Offs across Different Cocoa Production Systems in Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Abdulai, Issaka & Hoffmann, Munir P. & Jassogne, Laurence & Asare, Richard & Graefe, Sophie & Tao, Hsiao-Hang & Muilerman, Sander & Vaast, Philippe & Van Asten, Piet & Läderach, Peter & Rötter, Reimun, 2020. "Variations in yield gaps of smallholder cocoa systems and the main determining factors along a climate gradient in Ghana," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. Jean-Luc Kouassi & Allegra Kouassi & Yeboi Bene & Dieudonné Konan & Ebagnerin J. Tondoh & Christophe Kouame, 2021. "Exploring Barriers to Agroforestry Adoption by Cocoa Farmers in South-Western Côte d’Ivoire," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Eberhard, Erich K. & Hicks, Jessica & Simon, Adam C. & Arbic, Brian K., 2022. "Livelihood considerations in land-use decision-making: Cocoa and mining in Ghana," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    9. Tennhardt, Lina & Lazzarini, Gianna & Weisshaidinger, Rainer & Schader, Christian, 2022. "Do environmentally-friendly cocoa farms yield social and economic co-benefits?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    10. Asante, Paulina A. & Rozendaal, Danaё M.A. & Rahn, Eric & Zuidema, Pieter A. & Quaye, Amos K. & Asare, Richard & Läderach, Peter & Anten, Niels P.R., 2021. "Unravelling drivers of high variability of on-farm cocoa yields across environmental gradients in Ghana," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Hernandez-Aguilera, J. Nicolas & Conrad, Jon M. & Gómez, Miguel I. & Rodewald, Amanda D., 2019. "The Economics and Ecology of Shade-grown Coffee: A Model to Incentivize Shade and Bird Conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 110-121.
    12. Miftha Beshir & Menfese Tadesse & Fantaw Yimer & Nicolas Brüggemann, 2022. "Factors Affecting Adoption and Intensity of Use of Tef- Acacia decurrens -Charcoal Production Agroforestry System in Northwestern Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:1:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1038_s41893-018-0062-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.