IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v5y2021i1d10.1038_s41562-020-0929-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polarity of uncertainty representation during exploration and exploitation in ventromedial prefrontal cortex

Author

Listed:
  • Nadescha Trudel

    (University of Oxford)

  • Jacqueline Scholl

    (University of Oxford)

  • Miriam C. Klein-Flügge

    (University of Oxford)

  • Elsa Fouragnan

    (University of Oxford
    University of Plymouth)

  • Lev Tankelevitch

    (University of Oxford)

  • Marco K. Wittmann

    (University of Oxford)

  • Matthew F. S. Rushworth

    (University of Oxford)

Abstract

Environments furnish multiple information sources for making predictions about future events. Here we use behavioural modelling and functional magnetic resonance imaging to describe how humans select predictors that might be most relevant. First, during early encounters with potential predictors, participants’ selections were explorative and directed towards subjectively uncertain predictors (positive uncertainty effect). This was particularly the case when many future opportunities remained to exploit knowledge gained. Then, preferences for accurate predictors increased over time, while uncertain predictors were avoided (negative uncertainty effect). The behavioural transition from positive to negative uncertainty-driven selections was accompanied by changes in the representations of belief uncertainty in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). The polarity of uncertainty representations (positive or negative encoding of uncertainty) changed between exploration and exploitation periods. Moreover, the two periods were separated by a third transitional period in which beliefs about predictors’ accuracy predominated. The vmPFC signals a multiplicity of decision variables, the strength and polarity of which vary with behavioural context.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadescha Trudel & Jacqueline Scholl & Miriam C. Klein-Flügge & Elsa Fouragnan & Lev Tankelevitch & Marco K. Wittmann & Matthew F. S. Rushworth, 2021. "Polarity of uncertainty representation during exploration and exploitation in ventromedial prefrontal cortex," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 83-98, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:5:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41562-020-0929-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0929-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-0929-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-020-0929-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chih-Chung Ting & Nahuel Salem-Garcia & Stefano Palminteri & Jan B. Engelmann & Maël Lebreton, 2023. "Neural and computational underpinnings of biased confidence in human reinforcement learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Eleanor Holton & Jan Grohn & Harry Ward & Sanjay G. Manohar & Jill X. O’Reilly & Nils Kolling, 2024. "Goal commitment is supported by vmPFC through selective attention," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(7), pages 1351-1365, July.
    3. Johannes Algermissen & Jennifer C. Swart & René Scheeringa & Roshan Cools & Hanneke E. M. den Ouden, 2024. "Prefrontal signals precede striatal signals for biased credit assignment in motivational learning biases," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Christopher. A. Kelly & Tali Sharot, 2021. "Individual differences in information-seeking," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:5:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41562-020-0929-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.