IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v2y2018i4d10.1038_s41562-018-0317-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph E. Dunsmoor

    (University of Texas at Austin)

  • Marijn C. W. Kroes

    (Radboud University Medical Centre)

  • Caroline M. Moscatelli

    (New York University)

  • Michael D. Evans

    (New York University)

  • Lila Davachi

    (Columbia University)

  • Elizabeth A. Phelps

    (New York University
    New York University
    Nathan Kline Institute)

Abstract

Fear memories are characterized by their permanence and a fierce resistance to unlearning by new experiences. We considered whether this durability involves a process of memory segmentation that separates competing experiences. To address this question, we used an emotional-learning task designed to measure recognition memory for category exemplars encoded during competing experiences of fear conditioning and extinction. Here, we show that people recognized more fear-conditioned exemplars encoded during conditioning than conceptually related exemplars encoded immediately after a perceptual event boundary that separates conditioning from extinction. Selective episodic memory depended on a period of consolidation, an explicit break between competing experiences, and was unrelated to within-session arousal or the explicit realization of a transition from conditioning to extinction. Collectively, these findings suggest that event boundaries guide selective consolidation to prioritize emotional information in memory—at the expense of related but conflicting information experienced shortly thereafter. We put forward a model whereby event boundaries bifurcate related memory traces for incompatible experiences. This is in contrast to a mechanism that integrates related experiences for adaptive generalization1–3, and reveals a potentially distinct organization by which competing memories are adaptively segmented to select and protect nascent fear memories from immediate sources of interference.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph E. Dunsmoor & Marijn C. W. Kroes & Caroline M. Moscatelli & Michael D. Evans & Lila Davachi & Elizabeth A. Phelps, 2018. "Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(4), pages 291-299, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:2:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1038_s41562-018-0317-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0317-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0317-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-018-0317-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mason McClay & Matthew E. Sachs & David Clewett, 2023. "Dynamic emotional states shape the episodic structure of memory," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:2:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1038_s41562-018-0317-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.