IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v8y2017i1d10.1038_s41467-017-00114-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recent increases in terrestrial carbon uptake at little cost to the water cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Cheng

    (CSIRO Land and Water, Black Mountain)

  • Lu Zhang

    (CSIRO Land and Water, Black Mountain)

  • Ying-Ping Wang

    (CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere)

  • Josep G. Canadell

    (CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere)

  • Francis H. S. Chiew

    (CSIRO Land and Water, Black Mountain)

  • Jason Beringer

    (The University of Western Australia)

  • Longhui Li

    (University of Technology Sydney)

  • Diego G. Miralles

    (Ghent University)

  • Shilong Piao

    (Peking University
    Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Yongqiang Zhang

    (CSIRO Land and Water, Black Mountain)

Abstract

Quantifying the responses of the coupled carbon and water cycles to current global warming and rising atmospheric CO2 concentration is crucial for predicting and adapting to climate changes. Here we show that terrestrial carbon uptake (i.e. gross primary production) increased significantly from 1982 to 2011 using a combination of ground-based and remotely sensed land and atmospheric observations. Importantly, we find that the terrestrial carbon uptake increase is not accompanied by a proportional increase in water use (i.e. evapotranspiration) but is largely (about 90%) driven by increased carbon uptake per unit of water use, i.e. water use efficiency. The increased water use efficiency is positively related to rising CO2 concentration and increased canopy leaf area index, and negatively influenced by increased vapour pressure deficits. Our findings suggest that rising atmospheric CO2 concentration has caused a shift in terrestrial water economics of carbon uptake.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Cheng & Lu Zhang & Ying-Ping Wang & Josep G. Canadell & Francis H. S. Chiew & Jason Beringer & Longhui Li & Diego G. Miralles & Shilong Piao & Yongqiang Zhang, 2017. "Recent increases in terrestrial carbon uptake at little cost to the water cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-017-00114-5
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00114-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-00114-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-017-00114-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiang, Shouzheng & Wu, Jie & Wang, Zhihui & He, Ziling & Wang, Mingjun & Yao, Weiwei & Feng, Yu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal variations of cropland carbon sequestration and water loss across China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    2. Huang, Zhongdong & Zhang, Xiaoxian & Ashton, Rhys W. & Hawkesford, Malcom J. & Richard Whalley, W., 2023. "Root phenotyping and root water uptake calculation using soil water contents measured in a winter wheat field," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Chen, Yanan & Ding, Zhi & Yu, Pujia & Yang, Hong & Song, Lisheng & Fan, Lei & Han, Xujun & Ma, Mingguo & Tang, Xuguang, 2022. "Quantifying the variability in water use efficiency from the canopy to ecosystem scale across main croplands," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    4. Yang, Shanshan & Zhang, Jiahua & Wang, Jingwen & Zhang, Sha & Bai, Yun & Shi, Siqi & Cao, Dan, 2022. "Spatiotemporal variations of water productivity for cropland and driving factors over China during 2001–2015," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    5. Zefeng Chen & Weiguang Wang & Giovanni Forzieri & Alessandro Cescatti, 2024. "Transition from positive to negative indirect CO2 effects on the vegetation carbon uptake," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-017-00114-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.