IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v6y2015i1d10.1038_ncomms9289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exometabolite niche partitioning among sympatric soil bacteria

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Baran

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

  • Eoin L. Brodie

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
    Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley)

  • Jazmine Mayberry-Lewis

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
    School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University)

  • Eric Hummel

    (School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University)

  • Ulisses Nunes Da Rocha

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
    Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU Amsterdam)

  • Romy Chakraborty

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

  • Benjamin P. Bowen

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
    DOE Joint Genome Institute)

  • Ulas Karaoz

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

  • Hinsby Cadillo-Quiroz

    (School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University)

  • Ferran Garcia-Pichel

    (School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University)

  • Trent R. Northen

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
    DOE Joint Genome Institute)

Abstract

Soils are arguably the most microbially diverse ecosystems. Physicochemical properties have been associated with the maintenance of this diversity. Yet, the role of microbial substrate specialization is largely unexplored since substrate utilization studies have focused on simple substrates, not the complex mixtures representative of the soil environment. Here we examine the exometabolite composition of desert biological soil crusts (biocrusts) and the substrate preferences of seven biocrust isolates. The biocrust's main primary producer releases a diverse array of metabolites, and isolates of physically associated taxa use unique subsets of the complex metabolite pool. Individual isolates use only 13−26% of available metabolites, with only 2 out of 470 used by all and 40% not used by any. An extension of this approach to a mesophilic soil environment also reveals high levels of microbial substrate specialization. These results suggest that exometabolite niche partitioning may be an important factor in the maintenance of microbial diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Baran & Eoin L. Brodie & Jazmine Mayberry-Lewis & Eric Hummel & Ulisses Nunes Da Rocha & Romy Chakraborty & Benjamin P. Bowen & Ulas Karaoz & Hinsby Cadillo-Quiroz & Ferran Garcia-Pichel & Tre, 2015. "Exometabolite niche partitioning among sympatric soil bacteria," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms9289
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms9289
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms9289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah McLaughlin & Kateryna Zhalnina & Suzanne Kosina & Trent R. Northen & Joelle Sasse, 2023. "The core metabolome and root exudation dynamics of three phylogenetically distinct plant species," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. M Sreepadmanabh & Meenakshi Ganesh & Pratibha Sanjenbam & Christina Kurzthaler & Deepa Agashe & Tapomoy Bhattacharjee, 2024. "Cell shape affects bacterial colony growth under physical confinement," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Stefanie Imminger & Dimitri V. Meier & Arno Schintlmeister & Anton Legin & Jörg Schnecker & Andreas Richter & Osnat Gillor & Stephanie A. Eichorst & Dagmar Woebken, 2024. "Survival and rapid resuscitation permit limited productivity in desert microbial communities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms9289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.