IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v6y2015i1d10.1038_ncomms8776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fgf and Esrrb integrate epigenetic and transcriptional networks that regulate self-renewal of trophoblast stem cells

Author

Listed:
  • Paulina A. Latos

    (Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus
    Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge)

  • Angela Goncalves

    (Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute)

  • David Oxley

    (Proteomics Group, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus)

  • Hisham Mohammed

    (Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus)

  • Ernest Turro

    (University of Cambridge, NHS Blood and Transplant
    Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Robinson Way)

  • Myriam Hemberger

    (Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus
    Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge)

Abstract

Esrrb (oestrogen-related receptor beta) is a transcription factor implicated in embryonic stem (ES) cell self-renewal, yet its knockout causes intrauterine lethality due to defects in trophoblast development. Here we show that in trophoblast stem (TS) cells, Esrrb is a downstream target of fibroblast growth factor (Fgf) signalling and is critical to drive TS cell self-renewal. In contrast to its occupancy of pluripotency-associated loci in ES cells, Esrrb sustains the stemness of TS cells by direct binding and regulation of TS cell-specific transcription factors including Elf5 and Eomes. To elucidate the mechanisms whereby Esrrb controls the expression of its targets, we characterized its TS cell-specific interactome using mass spectrometry. Unlike in ES cells, Esrrb interacts in TS cells with the histone demethylase Lsd1 and with the RNA Polymerase II-associated Integrator complex. Our findings provide new insights into both the general and context-dependent wiring of transcription factor networks in stem cells by master transcription factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulina A. Latos & Angela Goncalves & David Oxley & Hisham Mohammed & Ernest Turro & Myriam Hemberger, 2015. "Fgf and Esrrb integrate epigenetic and transcriptional networks that regulate self-renewal of trophoblast stem cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms8776
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms8776
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms8776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moriyah Naama & Moran Rahamim & Valery Zayat & Shulamit Sebban & Ahmed Radwan & Dana Orzech & Rachel Lasry & Annael Ifrah & Mohammad Jaber & Ofra Sabag & Hazar Yassen & Areej Khatib & Silvina Epsztejn, 2023. "Pluripotency-independent induction of human trophoblast stem cells from fibroblasts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Andreas Lackner & Michael Müller & Magdalena Gamperl & Delyana Stoeva & Olivia Langmann & Henrieta Papuchova & Elisabeth Roitinger & Gerhard Dürnberger & Richard Imre & Karl Mechtler & Paulina A. Lato, 2023. "The Fgf/Erf/NCoR1/2 repressive axis controls trophoblast cell fate," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Kaela M. Varberg & Esteban M. Dominguez & Boryana Koseva & Joseph M. Varberg & Ross P. McNally & Ayelen Moreno-Irusta & Emily R. Wesley & Khursheed Iqbal & Warren A. Cheung & Carl Schwendinger-Schreck, 2023. "Extravillous trophoblast cell lineage development is associated with active remodeling of the chromatin landscape," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms8776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.