IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v6y2015i1d10.1038_ncomms8759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Single-trial dynamics of motor cortex and their applications to brain-machine interfaces

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan C. Kao

    (Stanford University)

  • Paul Nuyujukian

    (Stanford University
    School of Medicine, Stanford University)

  • Stephen I. Ryu

    (Stanford University
    Palo Alto Medical Foundation)

  • Mark M. Churchland

    (Columbia University)

  • John P. Cunningham

    (Columbia University)

  • Krishna V. Shenoy

    (Stanford University
    Stanford University
    Neurosciences Program, Stanford University
    Stanford University)

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that neural population responses have their own internal drive, or dynamics, that describe how the neural population evolves through time. An important prediction of neural dynamical models is that previously observed neural activity is informative of noisy yet-to-be-observed activity on single-trials, and may thus have a denoising effect. To investigate this prediction, we built and characterized dynamical models of single-trial motor cortical activity. We find these models capture salient dynamical features of the neural population and are informative of future neural activity on single trials. To assess how neural dynamics may beneficially denoise single-trial neural activity, we incorporate neural dynamics into a brain–machine interface (BMI). In online experiments, we find that a neural dynamical BMI achieves substantially higher performance than its non-dynamical counterpart. These results provide evidence that neural dynamics beneficially inform the temporal evolution of neural activity on single trials and may directly impact the performance of BMIs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan C. Kao & Paul Nuyujukian & Stephen I. Ryu & Mark M. Churchland & John P. Cunningham & Krishna V. Shenoy, 2015. "Single-trial dynamics of motor cortex and their applications to brain-machine interfaces," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms8759
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms8759
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms8759?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Josh Merel & David Carlson & Liam Paninski & John P Cunningham, 2016. "Neuroprosthetic Decoder Training as Imitation Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Jonathan A Michaels & Benjamin Dann & Hansjörg Scherberger, 2016. "Neural Population Dynamics during Reaching Are Better Explained by a Dynamical System than Representational Tuning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, November.
    3. David A. Sabatini & Matthew T. Kaufman, 2024. "Reach-dependent reorientation of rotational dynamics in motor cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms8759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.