IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v6y2015i1d10.1038_ncomms7896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10−18 total uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • T.L. Nicholson

    (JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Colorado
    University of Colorado)

  • S.L. Campbell

    (JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Colorado
    University of Colorado)

  • R.B. Hutson

    (JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Colorado
    University of Colorado)

  • G.E. Marti

    (JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Colorado
    University of Colorado)

  • B.J. Bloom

    (JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Colorado
    University of Colorado
    Present address: Intel, Hillsboro, OR, USA)

  • R.L. McNally

    (JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Colorado
    University of Colorado)

  • W. Zhang

    (JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Colorado
    University of Colorado)

  • M.D. Barrett

    (JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Colorado
    Centre for Quantum Technologies)

  • M.S. Safronova

    (University of Delaware
    Joint Quantum Institute, NIST and the University of Maryland)

  • G.F. Strouse

    (National Institute of Standards and Technology)

  • W.L. Tew

    (National Institute of Standards and Technology)

  • J. Ye

    (JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Colorado
    University of Colorado)

Abstract

The pursuit of better atomic clocks has advanced many research areas, providing better quantum state control, new insights in quantum science, tighter limits on fundamental constant variation and improved tests of relativity. The record for the best stability and accuracy is currently held by optical lattice clocks. Here we take an important step towards realizing the full potential of a many-particle clock with a state-of-the-art stable laser. Our 87Sr optical lattice clock now achieves fractional stability of 2.2 × 10−16 at 1 s. With this improved stability, we perform a new accuracy evaluation of our clock, reducing many systematic uncertainties that limited our previous measurements, such as those in the lattice ac Stark shift, the atoms’ thermal environment and the atomic response to room-temperature blackbody radiation. Our combined measurements have reduced the total uncertainty of the JILA Sr clock to 2.1 × 10−18 in fractional frequency units.

Suggested Citation

  • T.L. Nicholson & S.L. Campbell & R.B. Hutson & G.E. Marti & B.J. Bloom & R.L. McNally & W. Zhang & M.D. Barrett & M.S. Safronova & G.F. Strouse & W.L. Tew & J. Ye, 2015. "Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10−18 total uncertainty," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms7896
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms7896
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms7896?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jongmin Lee & Roger Ding & Justin Christensen & Randy R. Rosenthal & Aaron Ison & Daniel P. Gillund & David Bossert & Kyle H. Fuerschbach & William Kindel & Patrick S. Finnegan & Joel R. Wendt & Micha, 2022. "A compact cold-atom interferometer with a high data-rate grating magneto-optical trap and a photonic-integrated-circuit-compatible laser system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms7896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.