Author
Listed:
- Mariarosaria Rosa
(UPMC Hillman Cancer Center at the University of Pittsburgh)
- Ryan P. Barnes
(UPMC Hillman Cancer Center at the University of Pittsburgh
University of Kansas Medical Center)
- Ariana C. Detwiler
(UPMC Hillman Cancer Center at the University of Pittsburgh)
- Prasanth R. Nyalapatla
(University of Pittsburgh)
- Peter Wipf
(UPMC Hillman Cancer Center at the University of Pittsburgh
University of Pittsburgh)
- Patricia L. Opresko
(UPMC Hillman Cancer Center at the University of Pittsburgh
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health)
Abstract
Telomeres are hypersensitive to the formation of the common oxidative lesion 8-oxoguanine (8oxoG), which impacts telomere stability and function. OGG1 and MUTYH glycosylases initiate base excision repair (BER) to remove 8oxoG or prevent mutation. Here, we show OGG1 loss or inhibition, or MUTYH loss, partially rescues telomeric 8oxoG-induced premature senescence and associated proinflammatory responses, while loss of both glycosylases causes a near complete rescue in human fibroblasts. Glycosylase deficiency also suppresses 8oxoG-induced telomere fragility and dysfunction, indicating that downstream single-stranded break (SSB) repair intermediates impair telomere replication. Preventing BER initiation suppresses PARylation and confers resistance to the synergistic effects of PARP inhibitors on 8oxoG-induced senescence. However, OGG1 activity is essential for preserving cell growth after chronic telomeric 8oxoG formation, whereas MUTYH promotes senescence to prevent chromosomal instability from unrepaired damage. Our studies reveal that inefficient completion of 8oxoG BER at telomeres triggers cellular senescence via SSB intermediates which disrupt telomere function.
Suggested Citation
Mariarosaria Rosa & Ryan P. Barnes & Ariana C. Detwiler & Prasanth R. Nyalapatla & Peter Wipf & Patricia L. Opresko, 2025.
"OGG1 and MUTYH repair activities promote telomeric 8-oxoguanine induced senescence in human fibroblasts,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-55638-4
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55638-4
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-55638-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.