IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-41993-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Yeast Rad52 is a homodecamer and possesses BRCA2-like bipartite Rad51 binding modes

Author

Listed:
  • Jaigeeth Deveryshetty

    (Saint Louis University School of Medicine)

  • Rahul Chadda

    (Saint Louis University School of Medicine)

  • Jenna R. Mattice

    (Montana State University)

  • Simrithaa Karunakaran

    (Saint Louis University School of Medicine)

  • Michael J. Rau

    (Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine)

  • Katherine Basore

    (Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine)

  • Nilisha Pokhrel

    (Marquette University
    Aera Therapeutics)

  • Noah Englander

    (Saint Louis University School of Medicine)

  • James A. J. Fitzpatrick

    (Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine)

  • Brian Bothner

    (Montana State University)

  • Edwin Antony

    (Saint Louis University School of Medicine)

Abstract

Homologous recombination (HR) is an essential double-stranded DNA break repair pathway. In HR, Rad52 facilitates the formation of Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments on RPA-coated ssDNA. Here, we decipher how Rad52 functions using single-particle cryo-electron microscopy and biophysical approaches. We report that Rad52 is a homodecameric ring and each subunit possesses an ordered N-terminal and disordered C-terminal half. An intrinsic structural asymmetry is observed where a few of the C-terminal halves interact with the ordered ring. We describe two conserved charged patches in the C-terminal half that harbor Rad51 and RPA interacting motifs. Interactions between these patches regulate ssDNA binding. Surprisingly, Rad51 interacts with Rad52 at two different bindings sites: one within the positive patch in the disordered C-terminus and the other in the ordered ring. We propose that these features drive Rad51 nucleation onto a single position on the DNA to promote formation of uniform pre-synaptic Rad51 filaments in HR.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaigeeth Deveryshetty & Rahul Chadda & Jenna R. Mattice & Simrithaa Karunakaran & Michael J. Rau & Katherine Basore & Nilisha Pokhrel & Noah Englander & James A. J. Fitzpatrick & Brian Bothner & Edwin, 2023. "Yeast Rad52 is a homodecamer and possesses BRCA2-like bipartite Rad51 binding modes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-41993-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41993-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-41993-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-41993-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shane McDevitt & Timur Rusanov & Tatiana Kent & Gurushankar Chandramouly & Richard T. Pomerantz, 2018. "How RNA transcripts coordinate DNA recombination and repair," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Sahiti Kuppa & Jaigeeth Deveryshetty & Rahul Chadda & Jenna R. Mattice & Nilisha Pokhrel & Vikas Kaushik & Angela Patterson & Nalini Dhingra & Sushil Pangeni & Marisa K. Sadauskas & Sajad Shiekh & Ham, 2022. "Rtt105 regulates RPA function by configurationally stapling the flexible domains," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. James H. New & Tomohiko Sugiyama & Elena Zaitseva & Stephen C. Kowalczykowski, 1998. "Rad52 protein stimulates DNA strand exchange by Rad51 and replication protein A," Nature, Nature, vol. 391(6665), pages 407-410, January.
    4. Roxanne Oshidari & Richard Huang & Maryam Medghalchi & Elizabeth Y. W. Tse & Nasser Ashgriz & Hyun O. Lee & Haley Wyatt & Karim Mekhail, 2020. "DNA repair by Rad52 liquid droplets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiawei Ding & Xiangting Li & Jiangchuan Shen & Yiling Zhao & Shuchen Zhong & Luhua Lai & Hengyao Niu & Zhi Qi, 2023. "ssDNA accessibility of Rad51 is regulated by orchestrating multiple RPA dynamics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Sahiti Kuppa & Jaigeeth Deveryshetty & Rahul Chadda & Jenna R. Mattice & Nilisha Pokhrel & Vikas Kaushik & Angela Patterson & Nalini Dhingra & Sushil Pangeni & Marisa K. Sadauskas & Sajad Shiekh & Ham, 2022. "Rtt105 regulates RPA function by configurationally stapling the flexible domains," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Vera M. Kissling & Giordano Reginato & Eliana Bianco & Kristina Kasaciunaite & Janny Tilma & Gea Cereghetti & Natalie Schindler & Sung Sik Lee & Raphaël Guérois & Brian Luke & Ralf Seidel & Petr Cejka, 2022. "Mre11-Rad50 oligomerization promotes DNA double-strand break repair," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Yun-Long Wang & Wan-Wen Zhao & Shao-Mei Bai & Li-Li Feng & Shu-Ying Bie & Li Gong & Fang Wang & Ming-Biao Wei & Wei-Xing Feng & Xiao-Lin Pang & Cao-Litao Qin & Xin-Ke Yin & Ying-Nai Wang & Weihua Zhou, 2022. "MRNIP condensates promote DNA double-strand break sensing and end resection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Guangxue Liu & Jimin Li & Boxue He & Jiaqi Yan & Jingyu Zhao & Xuejie Wang & Xiaocong Zhao & Jingyan Xu & Yeyao Wu & Simin Zhang & Xiaoli Gan & Chun Zhou & Xiangpan Li & Xinghua Zhang & Xuefeng Chen, 2023. "Bre1/RNF20 promotes Rad51-mediated strand exchange and antagonizes the Srs2/FBH1 helicases," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Judith Oehler & Carl A. Morrow & Matthew C. Whitby, 2023. "Gene duplication and deletion caused by over-replication at a fork barrier," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-41993-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.