IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-37910-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microbial biomanufacturing for space-exploration—what to take and when to make

Author

Listed:
  • Nils J. H. Averesch

    (Center for the Utilization of Biological Engineering in Space (CUBES)
    Stanford University)

  • Aaron J. Berliner

    (Center for the Utilization of Biological Engineering in Space (CUBES)
    University of California Berkeley)

  • Shannon N. Nangle

    (Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University
    Circe Bioscience Inc.)

  • Spencer Zezulka

    (Center for the Utilization of Biological Engineering in Space (CUBES)
    University of California Berkeley
    University of California Berkeley)

  • Gretchen L. Vengerova

    (Center for the Utilization of Biological Engineering in Space (CUBES)
    University of California Berkeley)

  • Davian Ho

    (Center for the Utilization of Biological Engineering in Space (CUBES)
    University of California Berkeley)

  • Cameran A. Casale

    (Center for the Utilization of Biological Engineering in Space (CUBES)
    University of California Berkeley)

  • Benjamin A. E. Lehner

    (Delft University of Technology)

  • Jessica E. Snyder

    (Blue Marble Space Institute of Science)

  • Kevin B. Clark

    (Cures Within Reach
    eXtreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE))

  • Lewis R. Dartnell

    (University of Westminster)

  • Craig S. Criddle

    (Center for the Utilization of Biological Engineering in Space (CUBES)
    Stanford University)

  • Adam P. Arkin

    (Center for the Utilization of Biological Engineering in Space (CUBES)
    University of California Berkeley)

Abstract

As renewed interest in human space-exploration intensifies, a coherent and modernized strategy for mission design and planning has become increasingly crucial. Biotechnology has emerged as a promising approach to increase resilience, flexibility, and efficiency of missions, by virtue of its ability to effectively utilize in situ resources and reclaim resources from waste streams. Here we outline four primary mission-classes on Moon and Mars that drive a staged and accretive biomanufacturing strategy. Each class requires a unique approach to integrate biomanufacturing into the existing mission-architecture and so faces unique challenges in technology development. These challenges stem directly from the resources available in a given mission-class—the degree to which feedstocks are derived from cargo and in situ resources—and the degree to which loop-closure is necessary. As mission duration and distance from Earth increase, the benefits of specialized, sustainable biomanufacturing processes also increase. Consequentially, we define specific design-scenarios and quantify the usefulness of in-space biomanufacturing, to guide techno-economics of space-missions. Especially materials emerged as a potentially pivotal target for biomanufacturing with large impact on up-mass cost. Subsequently, we outline the processes needed for development, testing, and deployment of requisite technologies. As space-related technology development often does, these advancements are likely to have profound implications for the creation of a resilient circular bioeconomy on Earth.

Suggested Citation

  • Nils J. H. Averesch & Aaron J. Berliner & Shannon N. Nangle & Spencer Zezulka & Gretchen L. Vengerova & Davian Ho & Cameran A. Casale & Benjamin A. E. Lehner & Jessica E. Snyder & Kevin B. Clark & Lew, 2023. "Microbial biomanufacturing for space-exploration—what to take and when to make," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-37910-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37910-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-37910-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-37910-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander F. Sandahl & Thuy J. D. Nguyen & Rikke A. Hansen & Martin B. Johansen & Troels Skrydstrup & Kurt V. Gothelf, 2021. "On-demand synthesis of phosphoramidites," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-7, December.
    2. Charles S. Cockell & Rosa Santomartino & Kai Finster & Annemiek C. Waajen & Lorna J. Eades & Ralf Moeller & Petra Rettberg & Felix M. Fuchs & Rob Houdt & Natalie Leys & Ilse Coninx & Jason Hatton & Lu, 2020. "Space station biomining experiment demonstrates rare earth element extraction in microgravity and Mars gravity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Claire L. McLeod & Mark. P. S. Krekeler, 2017. "Sources of Extraterrestrial Rare Earth Elements: To the Moon and Beyond," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-28, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gretchen Vengerova & Isaac Lipsky & Gwyneth A. Hutchinson & Nils J. H. Averesch & Aaron J. Berliner, 2024. "Space bioprocess engineering as a potential catalyst for sustainability," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(3), pages 238-246, March.
    2. Rosa Santomartino & Nils J. H. Averesch & Marufa Bhuiyan & Charles S. Cockell & Jesse Colangelo & Yosephine Gumulya & Benjamin Lehner & Ivanna Lopez-Ayala & Sean McMahon & Anurup Mohanty & Sergio R. S, 2023. "Toward sustainable space exploration: a roadmap for harnessing the power of microorganisms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Chen, Qi & Duan, Yongrui, 2023. "Impact of information disclosure on global supply chain greenwashing: Is more information transparency always better?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-37910-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.