IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-37430-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positive feedback induces switch between distributive and processive phosphorylation of Hog1

Author

Listed:
  • Maximilian Mosbacher

    (Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich
    Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich)

  • Sung Sik Lee

    (Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich
    Scientific Center for Optical and Electron Microscopy, ETH Zurich)

  • Gilad Yaakov

    (Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF)
    Weizmann Institute of Science)

  • Mariona Nadal-Ribelles

    (Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF)
    The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Eulàlia Nadal

    (Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF)
    The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Frank Drogen

    (Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich)

  • Francesc Posas

    (Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF)
    The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Matthias Peter

    (Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich)

  • Manfred Claassen

    (Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich
    University of Tübingen
    University of Tübingen
    University Hospital Tübingen, University of Tübingen)

Abstract

Cellular decision making often builds on ultrasensitive MAPK pathways. The phosphorylation mechanism of MAP kinase has so far been described as either distributive or processive, with distributive mechanisms generating ultrasensitivity in theoretical analyses. However, the in vivo mechanism of MAP kinase phosphorylation and its activation dynamics remain unclear. Here, we characterize the regulation of the MAP kinase Hog1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via topologically different ODE models, parameterized on multimodal activation data. Interestingly, our best fitting model switches between distributive and processive phosphorylation behavior regulated via a positive feedback loop composed of an affinity and a catalytic component targeting the MAP kinase-kinase Pbs2. Indeed, we show that Hog1 directly phosphorylates Pbs2 on serine 248 (S248), that cells expressing a non-phosphorylatable (S248A) or phosphomimetic (S248E) mutant show behavior that is consistent with simulations of disrupted or constitutively active affinity feedback and that Pbs2-S248E shows significantly increased affinity to Hog1 in vitro. Simulations further suggest that this mixed Hog1 activation mechanism is required for full sensitivity to stimuli and to ensure robustness to different perturbations.

Suggested Citation

  • Maximilian Mosbacher & Sung Sik Lee & Gilad Yaakov & Mariona Nadal-Ribelles & Eulàlia Nadal & Frank Drogen & Francesc Posas & Matthias Peter & Manfred Claassen, 2023. "Positive feedback induces switch between distributive and processive phosphorylation of Hog1," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-37430-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37430-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-37430-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-37430-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edgar Altszyler & Alejandra C Ventura & Alejandro Colman-Lerner & Ariel Chernomoretz, 2017. "Ultrasensitivity in signaling cascades revisited: Linking local and global ultrasensitivity estimations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Piers Nash & Xiaojing Tang & Stephen Orlicky & Qinghua Chen & Frank B. Gertler & Michael D. Mendenhall & Frank Sicheri & Tony Pawson & Mike Tyers, 2001. "Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6863), pages 514-521, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anneke Brümmer & Carlos Salazar & Vittoria Zinzalla & Lilia Alberghina & Thomas Höfer, 2010. "Mathematical Modelling of DNA Replication Reveals a Trade-off between Coherence of Origin Activation and Robustness against Rereplication," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Christopher A. Waudby & Saul Alvarez-Teijeiro & E. Josue Ruiz & Simon Suppinger & Nikos Pinotsis & Paul R. Brown & Axel Behrens & John Christodoulou & Anastasia Mylona, 2022. "An intrinsic temporal order of c-JUN N-terminal phosphorylation regulates its activity by orchestrating co-factor recruitment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Juan Manuel Valverde & Geronimo Dubra & Michael Phillips & Austin Haider & Carlos Elena-Real & Aurélie Fournet & Emile Alghoul & Dhanvantri Chahar & Nuria Andrés-Sanchez & Matteo Paloni & Pau Bernadó , 2023. "A cyclin-dependent kinase-mediated phosphorylation switch of disordered protein condensation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Jacob D Feala & Jorge Cortes & Phillip M Duxbury & Andrew D McCulloch & Carlo Piermarocchi & Giovanni Paternostro, 2012. "Statistical Properties and Robustness of Biological Controller-Target Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-37430-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.