IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-25411-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Humans and other commonly used model organisms are resistant to cycloheximide-mediated biases in ribosome profiling experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Puneet Sharma

    (Max Planck Research Group for RNA Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine
    Cells-in-Motion Cluster of Excellence, University of Muenster
    University of Bern)

  • Jie Wu

    (Max Planck Research Group for RNA Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine
    Cells-in-Motion Cluster of Excellence, University of Muenster
    University of Bern
    Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern)

  • Benedikt S. Nilges

    (Max Planck Research Group for RNA Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine
    Cells-in-Motion Cluster of Excellence, University of Muenster)

  • Sebastian A. Leidel

    (Max Planck Research Group for RNA Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine
    Cells-in-Motion Cluster of Excellence, University of Muenster
    University of Bern)

Abstract

Ribosome profiling measures genome-wide translation dynamics at sub-codon resolution. Cycloheximide (CHX), a widely used translation inhibitor to arrest ribosomes in these experiments, has been shown to induce biases in yeast, questioning its use. However, whether such biases are present in datasets of other organisms including humans is unknown. Here we compare different CHX-treatment conditions in human cells and yeast in parallel experiments using an optimized protocol. We find that human ribosomes are not susceptible to conformational restrictions by CHX, nor does it distort gene-level measurements of ribosome occupancy, measured decoding speed or the translational ramp. Furthermore, CHX-induced codon-specific biases on ribosome occupancy are not detectable in human cells or other model organisms. This shows that reported biases of CHX are species-specific and that CHX does not affect the outcome of ribosome profiling experiments in most settings. Our findings provide a solid framework to conduct and analyze ribosome profiling experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Puneet Sharma & Jie Wu & Benedikt S. Nilges & Sebastian A. Leidel, 2021. "Humans and other commonly used model organisms are resistant to cycloheximide-mediated biases in ribosome profiling experiments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-25411-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25411-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25411-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-25411-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinkai Wu & Mengze Xu & Jian-Rong Yang & Jian Lu, 2024. "Genome-wide impact of codon usage bias on translation optimization in Drosophila melanogaster," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-25411-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.