IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-25096-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An omics-based framework for assessing the health risk of antimicrobial resistance genes

Author

Listed:
  • An-Ni Zhang

    (The University of Hong Kong
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Jeffry M. Gaston

    (Google)

  • Chengzhen L. Dai

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Shijie Zhao

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Mathilde Poyet

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Mathieu Groussin

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Xiaole Yin

    (The University of Hong Kong)

  • Li-Guan Li

    (The University of Hong Kong)

  • Mark C. M. Loosdrecht

    (Delft University of Technology)

  • Edward Topp

    (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada)

  • Michael R. Gillings

    (Macquarie University)

  • William P. Hanage

    (Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health)

  • James M. Tiedje

    (Michigan State University)

  • Katya Moniz

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Eric J. Alm

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Tong Zhang

    (The University of Hong Kong
    The University of Hong Kong
    The University of Hong Kong)

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are widespread among bacteria. However, not all ARGs pose serious threats to public health, highlighting the importance of identifying those that are high-risk. Here, we developed an ‘omics-based’ framework to evaluate ARG risk considering human-associated-enrichment, gene mobility, and host pathogenicity. Our framework classifies human-associated, mobile ARGs (3.6% of all ARGs) as the highest risk, which we further differentiate as ‘current threats’ (Rank I; 3%) - already present among pathogens - and ‘future threats’ (Rank II; 0.6%) - novel resistance emerging from non-pathogens. Our framework identified 73 ‘current threat’ ARG families. Of these, 35 were among the 37 high-risk ARGs proposed by the World Health Organization and other literature; the remaining 38 were significantly enriched in hospital plasmids. By evaluating all pathogen genomes released since framework construction, we confirmed that ARGs that recently transferred into pathogens were significantly enriched in Rank II (‘future threats’). Lastly, we applied the framework to gut microbiome genomes from fecal microbiota transplantation donors. We found that although ARGs were widespread (73% of genomes), only 8.9% of genomes contained high-risk ARGs. Our framework provides an easy-to-implement approach to identify current and future antimicrobial resistance threats, with potential clinical applications including reducing risk of microbiome-based interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • An-Ni Zhang & Jeffry M. Gaston & Chengzhen L. Dai & Shijie Zhao & Mathilde Poyet & Mathieu Groussin & Xiaole Yin & Li-Guan Li & Mark C. M. Loosdrecht & Edward Topp & Michael R. Gillings & William P. H, 2021. "An omics-based framework for assessing the health risk of antimicrobial resistance genes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-25096-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25096-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25096-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-25096-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhenyan Zhang & Qi Zhang & Tingzhang Wang & Nuohan Xu & Tao Lu & Wenjie Hong & Josep Penuelas & Michael Gillings & Meixia Wang & Wenwen Gao & Haifeng Qian, 2022. "Assessment of global health risk of antibiotic resistance genes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Michelle Baker & Xibin Zhang & Alexandre Maciel-Guerra & Kubra Babaarslan & Yinping Dong & Wei Wang & Yujie Hu & David Renney & Longhai Liu & Hui Li & Maqsud Hossain & Stephan Heeb & Zhiqin Tong & Nic, 2024. "Convergence of resistance and evolutionary responses in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica co-inhabiting chicken farms in China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-25096-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.