IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-24112-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Molecular determinants of response to PD-L1 blockade across tumor types

Author

Listed:
  • Romain Banchereau

    (Genentech)

  • Ning Leng

    (Genentech)

  • Oliver Zill

    (Genentech)

  • Ethan Sokol

    (Foundation Medicine)

  • Gengbo Liu

    (Genentech)

  • Dean Pavlick

    (Foundation Medicine)

  • Sophia Maund

    (Genentech)

  • Li-Fen Liu

    (Genentech)

  • Edward Kadel

    (Genentech)

  • Nicole Baldwin

    (Baylor Institute for Immunology Research)

  • Suchit Jhunjhunwala

    (Genentech)

  • Dorothee Nickles

    (Genentech)

  • Zoe June Assaf

    (Genentech)

  • Daniel Bower

    (Genentech)

  • Namrata Patil

    (Genentech)

  • Mark McCleland

    (Genentech)

  • David Shames

    (Genentech)

  • Luciana Molinero

    (Genentech)

  • Mahrukh Huseni

    (Genentech)

  • Shomyseh Sanjabi

    (Genentech)

  • Craig Cummings

    (Genentech)

  • Ira Mellman

    (Genentech)

  • Sanjeev Mariathasan

    (Genentech)

  • Priti Hegde

    (Foundation Medicine)

  • Thomas Powles

    (Queen Mary University of London)

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis lead to durable clinical responses in subsets of cancer patients across multiple indications, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), urothelial carcinoma (UC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Herein, we complement PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) with RNA-seq in 366 patients to identify unifying and indication-specific molecular profiles that can predict response to checkpoint blockade across these tumor types. Multiple machine learning approaches failed to identify a baseline transcriptional signature highly predictive of response across these indications. Signatures described previously for immune checkpoint inhibitors also failed to validate. At the pathway level, significant heterogeneity is observed between indications, in particular within the PD-L1+ tumors. mUC and NSCLC are molecularly aligned, with cell cycle and DNA damage repair genes associated with response in PD-L1- tumors. At the gene level, the CDK4/6 inhibitor CDKN2A is identified as a significant transcriptional correlate of response, highlighting the association of non-immune pathways to the outcome of checkpoint blockade. This cross-indication analysis reveals molecular heterogeneity between mUC, NSCLC and RCC tumors, suggesting that indication-specific molecular approaches should be prioritized to formulate treatment strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Romain Banchereau & Ning Leng & Oliver Zill & Ethan Sokol & Gengbo Liu & Dean Pavlick & Sophia Maund & Li-Fen Liu & Edward Kadel & Nicole Baldwin & Suchit Jhunjhunwala & Dorothee Nickles & Zoe June As, 2021. "Molecular determinants of response to PD-L1 blockade across tumor types," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-24112-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24112-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24112-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-24112-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colin Y. C. Lee & Bethany C. Kennedy & Nathan Richoz & Isaac Dean & Zewen K. Tuong & Fabrina Gaspal & Zhi Li & Claire Willis & Tetsuo Hasegawa & Sarah K. Whiteside & David A. Posner & Gianluca Carless, 2024. "Tumour-retained activated CCR7+ dendritic cells are heterogeneous and regulate local anti-tumour cytolytic activity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-24112-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.