IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-23154-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Covalency does not suppress O2 formation in 4d and 5d Li-rich O-redox cathodes

Author

Listed:
  • Robert A. House

    (University of Oxford
    The Henry Royce Institute
    Quad One, Becquerel Avenue, Harwell Campus)

  • John-Joseph Marie

    (University of Oxford
    The Henry Royce Institute
    Quad One, Becquerel Avenue, Harwell Campus)

  • Joohyuk Park

    (University of Oxford
    The Henry Royce Institute
    Quad One, Becquerel Avenue, Harwell Campus)

  • Gregory J. Rees

    (University of Oxford
    The Henry Royce Institute
    Quad One, Becquerel Avenue, Harwell Campus)

  • Stefano Agrestini

    (Harwell Campus)

  • Abhishek Nag

    (Harwell Campus)

  • Mirian Garcia-Fernandez

    (Harwell Campus)

  • Ke-Jin Zhou

    (Harwell Campus)

  • Peter G. Bruce

    (University of Oxford
    The Henry Royce Institute
    Quad One, Becquerel Avenue, Harwell Campus)

Abstract

Layered Li-rich transition metal oxides undergo O-redox, involving the oxidation of the O2− ions charge compensated by extraction of Li+ ions. Recent results have shown that for 3d transition metal oxides the oxidized O2− forms molecular O2 trapped in the bulk particles. Other forms of oxidised O2− such as O22− or (O–O)n− with long bonds have been proposed, based especially on work on 4 and 5d transition metal oxides, where TM–O bonding is more covalent. Here, we show, using high resolution RIXS that molecular O2 is formed in the bulk particles on O2‒ oxidation in the archetypal Li-rich ruthenates and iridate compounds, Li2RuO3, Li2Ru0.5Sn0.5O3 and Li2Ir0.5Sn0.5O3. The results indicate that O-redox occurs across 3, 4, and 5d transition metal oxides, forming O2, i.e. the greater covalency of the 4d and 5d compounds still favours O2. RIXS and XAS data for Li2IrO3 are consistent with a charge compensation mechanism associated primarily with Ir redox up to and beyond the 5+ oxidation state, with no evidence of O–O dimerization.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert A. House & John-Joseph Marie & Joohyuk Park & Gregory J. Rees & Stefano Agrestini & Abhishek Nag & Mirian Garcia-Fernandez & Ke-Jin Zhou & Peter G. Bruce, 2021. "Covalency does not suppress O2 formation in 4d and 5d Li-rich O-redox cathodes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-7, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-23154-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23154-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-23154-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-23154-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun-Hyuk Song & Seungju Yu & Byunghoon Kim & Donggun Eum & Jiung Cho & Ho-Young Jang & Sung-O Park & Jaekyun Yoo & Youngmin Ko & Kyeongsu Lee & Myeong Hwan Lee & Byungwook Kang & Kisuk Kang, 2023. "Slab gliding, a hidden factor that induces irreversibility and redox asymmetry of lithium-rich layered oxide cathodes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Kit McColl & Robert A. House & Gregory J. Rees & Alexander G. Squires & Samuel W. Coles & Peter G. Bruce & Benjamin J. Morgan & M. Saiful Islam, 2022. "Transition metal migration and O2 formation underpin voltage hysteresis in oxygen-redox disordered rocksalt cathodes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Tianwei Cui & Jialiang Xu & Xin Wang & Longxiang Liu & Yuxuan Xiang & Hong Zhu & Xiang Li & Yongzhu Fu, 2024. "Highly reversible transition metal migration in superstructure-free Li-rich oxide boosting voltage stability and redox symmetry," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-23154-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.