IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-21389-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of rhesus and cynomolgus macaques as an infection model for COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco J. Salguero

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Andrew D. White

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Gillian S. Slack

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Susan A. Fotheringham

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Kevin R. Bewley

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Karen E. Gooch

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Stephanie Longet

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Holly E. Humphries

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Robert J. Watson

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Laura Hunter

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Kathryn A. Ryan

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Yper Hall

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Laura Sibley

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Charlotte Sarfas

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Lauren Allen

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Marilyn Aram

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Emily Brunt

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Phillip Brown

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Karen R. Buttigieg

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Breeze E. Cavell

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Rebecca Cobb

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Naomi S. Coombes

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Alistair Darby

    (University of Liverpool)

  • Owen Daykin-Pont

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Michael J. Elmore

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Isabel Garcia-Dorival

    (University of Liverpool)

  • Konstantinos Gkolfinos

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Kerry J. Godwin

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Jade Gouriet

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Rachel Halkerston

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Debbie J. Harris

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Thomas Hender

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Catherine M. K. Ho

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Chelsea L. Kennard

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Daniel Knott

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Stephanie Leung

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Vanessa Lucas

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Adam Mabbutt

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Alexandra L. Morrison

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Charlotte Nelson

    (University of Liverpool)

  • Didier Ngabo

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Jemma Paterson

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Elizabeth J. Penn

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Steve Pullan

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Irene Taylor

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Tom Tipton

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Stephen Thomas

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Julia A. Tree

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Carrie Turner

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Edith Vamos

    (University of Liverpool)

  • Nadina Wand

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Nathan R. Wiblin

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Sue Charlton

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Xiaofeng Dong

    (University of Liverpool)

  • Bassam Hallis

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Geoffrey Pearson

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Emma L. Rayner

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Andrew G. Nicholson

    (Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College)

  • Simon G. Funnell

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Julian A. Hiscox

    (University of Liverpool
    Infectious Diseases Horizontal Technology Centre (ID HTC), A*STAR)

  • Mike J. Dennis

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Fergus V. Gleeson

    (Oxford University)

  • Sally Sharpe

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE))

  • Miles W. Carroll

    (National Infection Service, Public Health England (PHE)
    Oxford University)

Abstract

A novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, has been identified as the causative agent of the current COVID-19 pandemic. Animal models, and in particular non-human primates, are essential to understand the pathogenesis of emerging diseases and to assess the safety and efficacy of novel vaccines and therapeutics. Here, we show that SARS-CoV-2 replicates in the upper and lower respiratory tract and causes pulmonary lesions in both rhesus and cynomolgus macaques. Immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 are also similar in both species and equivalent to those reported in milder infections and convalescent human patients. This finding is reiterated by our transcriptional analysis of respiratory samples revealing the global response to infection. We describe a new method for lung histopathology scoring that will provide a metric to enable clearer decision making for this key endpoint. In contrast to prior publications, in which rhesus are accepted to be the preferred study species, we provide convincing evidence that both macaque species authentically represent mild to moderate forms of COVID-19 observed in the majority of the human population and both species should be used to evaluate the safety and efficacy of interventions against SARS-CoV-2. Importantly, accessing cynomolgus macaques will greatly alleviate the pressures on current rhesus stocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco J. Salguero & Andrew D. White & Gillian S. Slack & Susan A. Fotheringham & Kevin R. Bewley & Karen E. Gooch & Stephanie Longet & Holly E. Humphries & Robert J. Watson & Laura Hunter & Kathry, 2021. "Comparison of rhesus and cynomolgus macaques as an infection model for COVID-19," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-21389-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21389-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-21389-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-21389-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Federico Armando & Georg Beythien & Franziska K. Kaiser & Lisa Allnoch & Laura Heydemann & Malgorzata Rosiak & Svenja Becker & Mariana Gonzalez-Hernandez & Mart M. Lamers & Bart L. Haagmans & Kate Gui, 2022. "SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant causes mild pathology in the upper and lower respiratory tract of hamsters," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-21389-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.