IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v10y2019i1d10.1038_s41467-019-12572-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inferring and validating mechanistic models of neural microcircuits based on spike-train data

Author

Listed:
  • Josef Ladenbauer

    (Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, INSERM U960, École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University)

  • Sam McKenzie

    (Neuroscience Institute, New York University)

  • Daniel Fine English

    (School of Neuroscience, Virginia Tech)

  • Olivier Hagens

    (Laboratory of Neural Microcircuitry, Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)

  • Srdjan Ostojic

    (Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, INSERM U960, École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University)

Abstract

The interpretation of neuronal spike train recordings often relies on abstract statistical models that allow for principled parameter estimation and model selection but provide only limited insights into underlying microcircuits. In contrast, mechanistic models are useful to interpret microcircuit dynamics, but are rarely quantitatively matched to experimental data due to methodological challenges. Here we present analytical methods to efficiently fit spiking circuit models to single-trial spike trains. Using derived likelihood functions, we statistically infer the mean and variance of hidden inputs, neuronal adaptation properties and connectivity for coupled integrate-and-fire neurons. Comprehensive evaluations on synthetic data, validations using ground truth in-vitro and in-vivo recordings, and comparisons with existing techniques demonstrate that parameter estimation is very accurate and efficient, even for highly subsampled networks. Our methods bridge statistical, data-driven and theoretical, model-based neurosciences at the level of spiking circuits, for the purpose of a quantitative, mechanistic interpretation of recorded neuronal population activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Josef Ladenbauer & Sam McKenzie & Daniel Fine English & Olivier Hagens & Srdjan Ostojic, 2019. "Inferring and validating mechanistic models of neural microcircuits based on spike-train data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-12572-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12572-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12572-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-019-12572-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Protachevicz, Paulo R. & Batista, Antonio M. & Caldas, Iberê L. & Baptista, Murilo S., 2024. "Analytical solutions for the short-term plasticity," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Mikhail Genkin & Owen Hughes & Tatiana A. Engel, 2021. "Learning non-stationary Langevin dynamics from stochastic observations of latent trajectories," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Rishi Rajalingham & Aída Piccato & Mehrdad Jazayeri, 2022. "Recurrent neural networks with explicit representation of dynamic latent variables can mimic behavioral patterns in a physical inference task," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-12572-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.