IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcli/v8y2018i4d10.1038_s41558-018-0118-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 °C global warming

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna B. Tokarska

    (University of Victoria
    University of Edinburgh)

  • Nathan P. Gillett

    (University of Victoria)

Abstract

The Paris Agreement 1 commits ratifying parties to pursue efforts to limit the global temperature increase to 1.5 °C relative to pre-industrial levels. Carbon budgets2–5 consistent with remaining below 1.5 °C warming, reported in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5)2,6,8, are directly based on Earth system model (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5) 7 responses, which, on average, warm more than observations in response to historical CO2 emissions and other forcings8,9. These models indicate a median remaining budget of 55 PgC (ref. 10 , base period: year 1870) left to emit from January 2016, the equivalent to approximately five years of emissions at the 2015 rate11,12. Here we calculate warming and carbon budgets relative to the decade 2006–2015, which eliminates model–observation differences in the climate–carbon response over the historical period 9 , and increases the median remaining carbon budget to 208 PgC (33–66% range of 130–255 PgC) from January 2016 (with mean warming of 0.89 °C for 2006–2015 relative to 1861–188013–18). There is little sensitivity to the observational data set used to infer warming that has occurred, and no significant dependence on the choice of emissions scenario. Thus, although limiting median projected global warming to below 1.5 °C is undoubtedly challenging19–21, our results indicate it is not impossible, as might be inferred from the IPCC AR5 carbon budgets2,8.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna B. Tokarska & Nathan P. Gillett, 2018. "Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 °C global warming," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 296-299, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:8:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1038_s41558-018-0118-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0118-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0118-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41558-018-0118-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dhamu, Vikas & Mengqi, Xiao & Qureshi, M Fahed & Yin, Zhenyuan & Jana, Amiya K. & Linga, Praveen, 2024. "Evaluating CO2 hydrate kinetics in multi-layered sediments using experimental and machine learning approach: Applicable to CO2 sequestration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    2. Yang Ou & Christopher Roney & Jameel Alsalam & Katherine Calvin & Jared Creason & Jae Edmonds & Allen A. Fawcett & Page Kyle & Kanishka Narayan & Patrick O’Rourke & Pralit Patel & Shaun Ragnauth & Ste, 2021. "Deep mitigation of CO2 and non-CO2 greenhouse gases toward 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Zeyan Wu & Weiqun Luo & Zhongcheng Jiang & Zhaoxin Hu, 2024. "Influence of Biomass Amendments on Soil CO 2 Concentration and Carbon Emission Flux in a Subtropical Karst Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Xumin Zhang & Simin Qu & Jijie Shen & Yingbing Chen & Xiaoqiang Yang & Peng Jiang & Peng Shi, 2023. "Effect of Distinct Evaluation Objectives on Different Precipitation Downscaling Methods and the Corresponding Potential Impacts on Catchment Runoff Modelling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(5), pages 1913-1930, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:8:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1038_s41558-018-0118-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.