IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mve/journl/v39y2013i2p57-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Endogenous Knowledge Growth: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Tin-Chun Lin

    (Indiana University-Northwest)

Abstract

This paper explores factors that contribute to growth in undergraduate knowledge of economics. An endogenous growth empirical model was applied to estimate students’ knowledge growth. Sources of knowledge growth were extracted to identify each factor’s contribution. Analysis indicated that in-classroom factors (instructional skill and attendance) accounted for over 50% of knowledge growth. A complementarity test showed that in- and out-of-classroom efforts were not crowding out each other; moreover, instructional skill/progress and in-classroom efforts were complementary—the more frequently the student attended class, the greater the effect of the instructor’s instructional skills on student progress. Findings implied the importance of traditional classroom learning. In addition to offering online classes to raise enrollments and revenues, school authorities should be aware of the contribution and importance of traditional face-to-face classes and continue to improve the quality of traditional classroom learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Tin-Chun Lin, 2013. "Endogenous Knowledge Growth: An Empirical Study," Journal of Economic Insight, Missouri Valley Economic Association, vol. 39(2), pages 57-75.
  • Handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:39:y:2013:i:2:p:57-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gratiela Georgiana Noja & Alexandru Buglea & Ion Lala-Popa & Cecilia Nicoleta Jurcut, 2021. "The interplay between knowledge-based competitiveness, people’s good health and well-being: new empirical evidence from Central and Eastern European countries," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 441-466, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • A20 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - General
    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate
    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • C30 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:39:y:2013:i:2:p:57-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cullen Goenner (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mveaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.