IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jyf1hn/doi10.1431-109420y2024i2p419-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rebranding: History vs Innovation in the Fashion Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Carmela Ostillio
  • Martina Scandura

Abstract

In the luxury fashion industry, minimal rebranding of logos has become an increasingly common practice to stay up to date with market trends and new consumer expectations. The logos of many brands are increasingly being stripped of distinctive elements such as the founder’s name, the symbolic pictogram of the brand, or most often, the iconic features of the graphic style. Therefore, elements that are fundamental to the logo’s recognizability are being removed in favor of progressive homologation to competitors. This finding raises several questions about changes in consumer perception of such rebranding. The paper examines six episodes of minimalist rebranding in this industry (Burberry, Balmain, Balenciaga, Zegna, Saint Laurent and Ferragamo), including both examples of removal of the founder’s name from the logo and typographical changes, and aims to explore how these changes may affect the perception of brand authenticity. The empirical analysis combines qualitative and quantitative methodologies, making use of tools such as semi-structured qualitative research and quantitative web-based questionnaire, to obtain a complete and accurate view of the phenomenon and simultaneously ensure generalizable and statistically significant results.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Carmela Ostillio & Martina Scandura, 2024. "Rebranding: History vs Innovation in the Fashion Industry," Micro & Macro Marketing, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 419-448.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jyf1hn:doi:10.1431/109420:y:2024:i:2:p:419-448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1431/109420
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1431/109420
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jyf1hn:doi:10.1431/109420:y:2024:i:2:p:419-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.