IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jl9ury/doi10.1425-91627y2018i3p419-460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In-work poverty in a dual labour market: Individualization of social risks or stratification of social inequality?

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Barbieri
  • Giorgio Cutuli
  • Stefani Scherer

Abstract

In-work poverty (IWP) received increasing attention over the last years, both in political and scientific debates, not least due to its overall increase. This article documents the diffusion, persistency and the drivers of in-work poverty in Italy from 2000 to 2016, based on the Survey on Household Income and Wealth of the Bank of Italy (SHIW data). In line with recent publications, IWP affects around 10 to 12% of the relevant working population, but it is strongly stratified by individual and family level characteristics, like education, employment position and contract, as well as by the household composition. The presence of a (whatever type of) second income plays an important role for keeping families out of poverty. Moreover, IWP reveals a very sticky phenomenon, leading not only to the accumulation of inequalities but also to their persistency over time. Interestingly enough, the strong persistency can almost exclusively be attributed to structural individual factors and the household composition, rather than to genuine state dependency. The article concludes with a discussion of these findings in terms of policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Barbieri & Giorgio Cutuli & Stefani Scherer, 2018. "In-work poverty in a dual labour market: Individualization of social risks or stratification of social inequality?," Stato e mercato, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 419-460.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/91627:y:2018:i:3:p:419-460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1425/91627
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1425/91627
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/91627:y:2018:i:3:p:419-460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.