IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jl9ury/doi10.1425-114663y2024i2p333-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Actors and arenas of policy dismantling. The rise and fall of Débat public in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Giulio Citroni

Abstract

With the enactment of the so-called Procurement Code in 2016, the Public Debate procedure was introduced in Italy. Clearly modelled on the example of the French participatory and deliberative device of the same name, the Public Debate in Italy takes on dissimilar characteristics from the original, and is characterised by short timeframes, little autonomy, and above all a weak institutionalisation. On several occasions, the Public Debate was reformed, and in 2023, after only two years of full operation, it was essentially abolished amidst the indifference of the media, public opinion, and the main political and social actors. Following a brief reconstruction of the model constituted by the French Débat public, the essay reconstructs the vicissitudes of the Public Debate in Italy, with particular regard to the policy making process and to the network of political, institutional, economic and civic actors that has emerged around its launch and implementation. Through documentary analysis and a campaign of interviews with privileged witnesses, the essay argues that the dismantling of the Public Debate was largely due to the lack of an effective «instrument constituency», which in turn is due to its embedding in the public works policy arena, where the prevailing actors, norms and logics of action marginalise the defence and promotion of the participation of local communities, in stark contrast to what happens in the environmental arena.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulio Citroni, 2024. "Actors and arenas of policy dismantling. The rise and fall of Débat public in Italy," Stato e mercato, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 333-362.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/114663:y:2024:i:2:p:333-362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1425/114663
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1425/114663
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/114663:y:2024:i:2:p:333-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.