IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jl9ury/doi10.1425-114662y2024i2p293-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The art and craft of vaccination policy against Covid-19 in five EU countries

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Profeti
  • Barbara Saracino
  • Elena Macchioni

Abstract

Covid-19 vaccination campaign has been a worldwide challenge that all countries faced in their health response to the pandemic emergency from late 2020 onwards. That challenge concerned primarily the organization of vaccine rollout and the design of policy tools to counter vaccine hesitancy, which is a non-dichotomous, complex phenomenon that requires tailor-made policy solutions to be thwarted. Most recent publications on the Covid-19 vaccination campaigns focus on the causes of vaccination hesitancy in single countries or in comparative perspective. A more limited number of qualitative studies descriptively trace the organization of the vaccination campaign in one or few countries, sometimes estimating its effectiveness for vaccine uptake. This article tries to bridge these two strands of literature by systematically comparing the instruments employed in the Covid-19 vaccination campaign in five EU countries and formulating hypotheses about the reasons (including policy legacy and vaccine hesitancy) for the differences and the varying effectiveness of the strategies adopted. The conclusions try to draw lessons and make some recommendations for policymakers

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Profeti & Barbara Saracino & Elena Macchioni, 2024. "The art and craft of vaccination policy against Covid-19 in five EU countries," Stato e mercato, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 293-332.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/114662:y:2024:i:2:p:293-332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1425/114662
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1425/114662
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jl9ury:doi:10.1425/114662:y:2024:i:2:p:293-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.