IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jkrece/doi10.1446-27467y2008i2p157-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Costi e benefici del restauro

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Leon

Abstract

There are two different ways in evaluating costs and benefits of a restoration project: the market analysis and the collective analysis. While both need to calculate whether maintenance expenditure would not be more useful (restoration always implies some alteration) the market analysis is mainly based on the subjective value that a restored cultural good provides to visitors or owners. The collective analysis, instead, is based on the value for future generations and for individuals who are not capable of understanding that conservation is important. The State is the agent of the community, but its role is forgotten if restoration is preferred to maintenance, as it happens each time capital expenditure is considered more important than current expenditure.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Leon, 2008. "Costi e benefici del restauro," Economia della Cultura, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 157-160.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/27467:y:2008:i:2:p:157-160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1446/27467
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/27467
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jkrece:doi:10.1446/27467:y:2008:i:2:p:157-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.