IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jhpfyn/doi10.1434-90250y2018i1p159-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of F/Rand licensing between Us, Eu and China: Towards a Private Ordering solution?

Author

Listed:
  • Oscar Borgogno

Abstract

Il lavoro esordisce con un'analisi comparata dell'evoluzione normativa di Stati Uniti, Repubblica Popolare Cinese ed Unione europea con riferimento agli impegni F/Rand inerenti la licenza dei c.d. Standard "Essential Patents". Preso atto della divergenza disciplinare che separa gli approcci dei diversi sistemi, viene valutata criticamente la capacità dello schema di giustizia procedurale individuato dalla "CGUE" nel caso "Huawei" di elaborare una soluzione normativa fondata sull'auto-regolamentazione privata. La giurisprudenza, in un simile contesto, è chiamata a svolgere un compito di mero e fisiologico controllo circa l'adeguatezza antitrust ed il rispetto del principio di non-discriminazione delle condotte delle "Standard Setting Organizations" e dei titolari di SEPS.

Suggested Citation

  • Oscar Borgogno, 2018. "A Comparison of F/Rand licensing between Us, Eu and China: Towards a Private Ordering solution?," Mercato Concorrenza Regole, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 159-186.
    • Handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/90250:y:2018:i:1:p:159-186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1434/90250
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1434/90250
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jhpfyn:doi:10.1434/90250:y:2018:i:1:p:159-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.