Author
Abstract
The paper presents an analysis of the Italian scientific system compared with other industrialised countries. Specifically, the paper explores two main issues: 1) the productivity of Italian researchers and of R&D expenditure, measured by international scientific publications and patents filed to the European Patent Office, 2) the effectiveness of Italian research output as regards innovation and the technological development of the country. The main findings of this analysis are that: 1) productivity of researchers and of R&D expenditure has risen sharply during the Nineties. In 2000 it has been greater than the EU average measured by both publications and patents; 2) effectiveness, as measured by the international impact of scientific publications of the Italian universities and by the patent applications in strategic fields, is a much more controversial issue. According to the US National Science Foundation and the DSTI at OECD, the enabling technologies, i.e., biotechnology, nanotechnology, infotechnology, and neurosciences, will be the drivers of economic growth in the near future. The international impact of Italian publications is lower than the global average in the scientific fields related to the enabling technologies. Moreover, the relative production of patents regarding infotechnology and biotechnology has been decreasing during nineties. The main policy implication of this paper is that to improve the effectiveness of Italian scientific system one needs a deep integration of S&T policy with the others main public policies, i.e., industrial policy, competition policy, financial system policy, defence policy, and social policy.
Suggested Citation
Valerio Elia, 2005.
"Analisi comparata del sistema scientifico italiano e alcune indicazioni di policy,"
L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 361-380.
Handle:
RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/20144:y:2005:i:2:p:361-380
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/20144:y:2005:i:2:p:361-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.