IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jeijnl/v9y2023i1p114126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Teaching and Learning Using the Professional Learning Community through the CSIPL Process

Author

Listed:
  • Theerapat Sinthudech
  • Wannatida Yonwilad

Abstract

This research aims to 1) study activities that affected the success of the PLC process, 2) study the CSIPL-based learning management process, and 3) study the expression behaviors that provided opportunities to develop learning management based on the CSIPL process. The instruments in this study were- (1) The CSIPL learning management activity plan, which includes five activities- 1) Create a story, 2) Set rules, 3) Insert content, 4) Participate in the game, and 5) Lesson learned. (2) Behavior activities in the CSIPL form include- 1) puzzle letters; 2) haunted pianos; 3) lost eyes; 4) whispers; 5) The Book of Mantra, 6) puzzle sounds; 7) death messages; 8) believing I’m dead; 9) ghosts without voices, and 10) final codes. (3) PLC process assessment form. The data were analyzed using frequency, percentages, mean score (M), standard deviation (SD), and thematic analysis. This research shows that 1) collaboration and shared visions are the stationary driving forces, accounting for 10% of equal work values, while a high collective focus on student learning (45%) drives PLC processes. 2) CSIPL process averaged 4.03 with a standard deviation of 0.74 which shows the suitability of appropriateness at a high level. 3) The overall earnings management for the CSIPL process is 4.22, which means that the level of suitability is high. 4) Students lack the experience of learning what they receive from activities that reflect process control because teachers lack the expertise, they have achieved following the PLC process.Â

Suggested Citation

  • Theerapat Sinthudech & Wannatida Yonwilad, 2023. "Impact of Teaching and Learning Using the Professional Learning Community through the CSIPL Process," Journal of Educational Issues, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 114126-1141, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:jeijnl:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:114126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jei/article/download/20540/16052
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jei/article/view/20540
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jeijnl:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:114126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jei.macrothink.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.