IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jeijnl/v8y2022i2p304313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining Childhood Learning from Various Kind Formulas of Soft-Prepared Chalk

Author

Listed:
  • Orapin Sukyos
  • Pornsiri Santum

Abstract

This research aimed to find out a baby powder formula made of soft-prepared chalk and to investigate satisfaction with the selected formula baby powder. The research sample was 300 people consisting of parents, students, and general people who were likely to use baby powder. Research instruments were a colorimeter, water activity meter, moisture analyzer, and a questionnaire on consumer satisfaction with six baby powder formulas. Descriptive statistics were mean, percentage, and standard deviation for data analysis. Findings showed that a formula made of 25% soft-prepared chalk mixed with 75% rice flour was the most suitable formula to make baby powder due to its good water absorbability and ease of application. The consumer’s satisfaction with the selected baby powder formula was contact surface, color, ease of application, and overall preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Orapin Sukyos & Pornsiri Santum, 2022. "Determining Childhood Learning from Various Kind Formulas of Soft-Prepared Chalk," Journal of Educational Issues, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 304313-3043, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:jeijnl:v:8:y:2022:i:2:p:304313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jei/article/download/20064/15663
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jei/article/view/20064
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jeijnl:v:8:y:2022:i:2:p:304313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jei.macrothink.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.