IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jeijnl/v8y2022i1p680692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oxygen Uptake Off-Transient Kinetics Responses to Exercises

Author

Listed:
  • Elvin Onarici Gungor

Abstract

The kinetics of oxygen uptake during recovery is defined off-transient kinetics (Sousa et al., 2015). The purpose of this study was to compare the VO2 off-transient kinetics response of physical education students and also compare the different exercise intensities. Physical education students were grouped as males (n = 10) and females (n = 10). Subjects performed an incremental exercise test for the determination of cardiorespiratory responses. Subjects also performed below threshold exercise on different day. Oxygen uptake was tested via CPX Oxygen analyzer. Off-transient kinetics were modelled via mono-exponential model. The group mean of time to exhaustion was shown statistically significant difference 13±0.6 min for woman and 15±1 min for men and also, the group mean of ventilation at peak was shown statistically significant difference 88±10 L min-1 for woman and 127±35 L min-1 for men according to cardiorespiratory responses at peak exercise. Absolute VO2peak (L min-1), VO2peak (ml min-1), relative VO2peak (ml kg-1 min-1), HRmax (bpm), RER at exhaustion was shown no statistically significant difference between gender. The group mean of VO2off (ml kg-1 min-1) was shown statistically significant difference 36±6 for woman and 49±4 for men to the off-transient responses to peak exercise. But time constant of the off-transient response was shown no statistically significant difference (141±20 sec for woman and 127±27 sec for men) between gender. The group mean of VO2off (ml kg-1 min-1) and time constant of the off transient response was shown no statistically significant difference between gender (25±4 ml kg-1 min-1 for woman and 30±3 ml kg-1 min-1 for men; 153±29 secfor woman and 150±30 sec for men) to the off-transient responses to moderate intensity exercise. The group mean of VO2off (ml kg-1 min-1) at maximal exercise was found higher than moderate intensity exercise (p = .040) (43±8 ml kg-1 min-1 at maximal exercise and 27±4 ml kg-1 min-1 at moderate intensity exercise). The group mean of time constant of the off-transient response at maximal exercise was lower than moderate intensity exercise (p = .015) (134±24 secat maximal exercise, 151±28 sec at moderate intensity exercise). But time constant of the off transient response was shown no statistically significant difference (141±20 sec for woman and 127±27 sec for men) between gender. The group mean of VO2off (ml kg-1 min-1) and time constant of the off transient response was shown no statistically significant difference between gender (25±4 ml kg-1 min-1 for woman and 30±3 ml kg-1 min-1 for men; 153±29 secfor woman and 150±30 sec for men) to the off-transient responses to moderate intensity exercise. The group mean of VO2off (ml kg-1 min-1) at maximal exercise was higher than moderate intensity exercise (p = .040) (43±8 ml kg-1 min-1 at maximal exercise and 27±4 ml kg-1 min-1 at moderate intensity exercise). The group mean of time constant of the off transient response at maximal exercise was lower than moderate intensity exercise (p = .015) (134±24 secat maximal exercise, 151±28 sec at moderate intensity exercise). These findings indicate that gender and exercise intensities effect the recovery speed by speeding the rate of adjustment of oxidative phosphorylation.

Suggested Citation

  • Elvin Onarici Gungor, 2022. "Oxygen Uptake Off-Transient Kinetics Responses to Exercises," Journal of Educational Issues, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(1), pages 680692-6806, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:jeijnl:v:8:y:2022:i:1:p:680692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jei/article/download/19916/15507
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jei/article/view/19916
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jeijnl:v:8:y:2022:i:1:p:680692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jei.macrothink.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.