Author
Listed:
- Martijn F. H. Maessen
- Cornelia R. M. G. Fluit
- Micha Holla
- Gea Drost
- Marc A. T. M. Vorstenbosch
- Maarten C. de Waal Malefijt
- Jan G. M. Kooloos
- Esther Tanck
Abstract
Medical students consider anatomy, neurology, and traumatology as difficult study topics. A recent study showed that the daily quiz ‘Two Opportunities to Practice per day (TOPday)’ positively supported biomedical students in analyzing and solving biomechanical problems. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of TOPday on self-confidence, enthusiasm, and test results for the topics anatomy, neurology and traumatology. Second-year medical students were enrolled in a four-week course on the human skeletal system at the Radboudumc (n = 799). They were randomized over three topic groups (anatomy, neurology, and traumatology) and received TOPday quizzes on every course day. At the end of the course students filled in a non-anonymous questionnaire. Students highly appreciated TOPday (7.5±0.9) and this did not differ between groups (anatomy- 7.4±0.8; neurology- 7.4±1.1; traumatology- 7.5±0.8; P = 0.68). Many students reported that TOPday increased their self-confidence (65% of the students) and enthusiasm (69% of the students) for their topic. However, test results of the students did not improve. A potential explanation for the latter result may relate to the different cognitive processes that are required to study anatomy, neurology, and traumatology compared to biomechanics. In conclusion, appreciation, self-confidence and enthusiasm were positively associated with TOPday, but test results were not.
Suggested Citation
Martijn F. H. Maessen & Cornelia R. M. G. Fluit & Micha Holla & Gea Drost & Marc A. T. M. Vorstenbosch & Maarten C. de Waal Malefijt & Jan G. M. Kooloos & Esther Tanck, 2016.
"The Use of a Daily Quiz ‘TOPday’ as Supportive Learning Method for Medical Students,"
Journal of Educational Issues, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(2), pages 100112-1001, December.
Handle:
RePEc:mth:jeijnl:v:2:y:2016:i:2:p:100112
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jeijnl:v:2:y:2016:i:2:p:100112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jei.macrothink.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.